ABOUT THIS BLOG

In Field Notes, NBC News will shed light on the stories that don't always make the headlines as well as offering analysis on the big and small stories of the day.

Regular contributors include NBC News correspondents, producers and staff based in bureaus across the country and on assignment.

Click here to read more about the journalists behind this blog.



Quiet on Peterson’s street for the meantime...

Posted: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 1:22 PM

BOLINGBROOK, Ill. – As Drew Peterson took his case to the court of public opinion on the Today Show on Wednesday, he maintained his innocence, but was ready to convict the media for what he sees as excessive attention to the case

Police are re-examining the suspicious death of Peterson’s third wife, Kathleen Savio, whose body was exhumed Tuesday, and questions have been raised about the mysterious disappearance of his fourth wife, Stacy, but he denied involvement in either case.

The Illinois police sergeant told host Matt Lauer that he is not concerned about the police investigation into both cases, but is angry that the media is camped out in front of his house and has all but convicted him.

"I can look you right in the eye and tell you I had nothing to do with either of those instances," he said, adding, "I’m not afraid of law enforcement. I’m afraid of the media."

When Lauer asked Peterson why he agreed to appear on the show when he is the subject of an investigation, he said he did so in an effort to "get the media off my back." 

VIDEO: Drew Peterson talks to TODAY

Peterson said he was, "here today, in attempt to basically let them see my face, here I am. Please get away from my house and leave my family alone."

However the scene in Peterson’s neighborhood on Wednesday was relatively quiet, but relative being the key word. 

Quiet along Pheasant Chase Lane

On Wednesday morning, there were only two microwave trucks and our small Suburban-sized satellite truck parked along the cul-de-sac street in front of the Peterson home.

The only other thing visibly out of place in this otherwise picturesque Chicago suburb were the "Keep Out" and "No Trespassing" signs posted every six feet around a neighbor's yard in an effort to keep the media invasion off his grass.

I have been here for more than a week now and sympathize with the neighbors along Pheasant Chase Lane. This is the quietest this street has been since Stacy Peterson's disappearance made national headlines.

On a street where two cars parked side by side can cause a traffic jam, you can imagine how besieged residences feel when large dual-wheeled trucks with giant dishes set up shop at the end of their driveway and crank up generators that drone on endlessly.

There is no getting around it, this much media attention is invasive, but Peterson didn't help himself or his neighbors out with his actions. His evasive behavior, especially early on in the investigation, only made things worse. 

And in all truthfulness, as large and imposing as drew Peterson thinks the media's presence has been outside his house the last two weeks, it's been nothing compared to what it could be.

I've covered many stories where there have been far more camera's crews and trucks present. However, this is my job, not my neighborhood. So I guess perception is all relative… 

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

To calm, to well-rehearsed.  Guilty!!  Why wouldn't he use the media to HELP him find wife #4?  He doesn't want her found, or want anybody to figure out where she is! I feel sorry for the kids that are left behind w/no mother to take care of them!
Ok, he's "dating" a 17 year old while married to wife # 3. Can you say pedophile??!! Not to mention adulterer. It doesn't seem like he is a very trustworthy person just based on that information alone. Also, he says both women were "emotionally unstable". Isn't that what controling, abusive men like him look for in women or in Satcy's case, little girls? I'd be interested in knowing the ages of his other wive,s and the health and welbeing of wives 1 & 2
Isn't it always the husband, or lover? I can't believe he got away with offing # 3 for this long, and he certainly killed # 4. There is more to the story, maybe a connection to the mob or other unsavory characters who helped him dispose of the corpse. He's a dirty cop and a murderer.
The 1st 2 wives were abducted by space aliens, so this puts the government in a bind. This risks the truth comming out about life beyond our planet.
So, the media is hushed right now about wives 1 and 2 by orders of the federal government.
Hey! you guys, just don't comdemn before time, let the law to make justice...no body will live this life without paying everything we did in this creazy world...no matter how big or small it looks like it, this include you, includes me, includes police officers, layers, judges and even executers... there is no level for bad thinks, bad is bad, no matter from what angle you want to see it...
OMG!! This guy has handled FOUR women! I have turned bald, hair greyed with high blood pressure handling one (the only one) im my life.
It is sad that the police get by with things and we the public have to answer to our mistakes.  I pray if he is guilty that the police that could not find him guilty the first time will be punished for not doing their job right the first time.  I pray for the family and the children.
This creep was 47 years old when married to wife #3 and at the same time he was dating then 17 year old wife #4.  Does that qualify as rape?  Soon after divorcing wife #3 he marries wife #4 and wife #3 winds up dead in her bathtub.  Oh by the way, Sgt. Peterson got $1 million in insurance money from the death of #3 which may now actually be a homocide.  Peterson kept referring to both #3 and #4 as mental whack jobs in his interview with Matt Lauer.  That's right Sgt. blame the victims.  If I were related to #4 and it's proven that he offed her - this scumbag would be short lived. I hope he rots in prison as a bitch on the bunk beds of Bubba and Big Daddy! That would serve him right to be raped daily for the rest of his miserable life.
no need for him to have a trial now, the media has made sure that he will be found guilty. no courts needed, let the media do it and fire all law officals. the libs can then waste the taxpayers money on something else
Funny but in reading all the comments it seems like what Mr. Peterson is saying about the media may be right on target. All we seem to see and hear is "He's guilty." Whatever happened to innocent until proven guilty? I will agree there seems to be a prevalance of abusive relationships when it comes to police officers and yes many of them would know what to hide etc etc. But simply being a police officer and having allegations of abuse in your past and maybe your present does not make you a killer. Maybe he is but then again maybe not. I think I will let this play itself out hoping for the best for Stacy and for Drew and his children as well.
I know a number of people who are just like this guy. He comes across like a slime ball (and I think he is!). But the only real proof so far is that he's a crappy husband. Everything else has been media spin, the all to common "If it bleeds, it leads" policy, even if they have to use ketchup. I'm not convict him just because the Nancy Graces of the media tell me to!!
We all know that she is dead and he killed her.  One thing is clear, any person, I don't care how upset you are or how much you want out of a marriage.  No one would see this much publicity and never contact anyone!  She hasn't contacted family to say "hey I need time to decide how I am going to live my life."  Whatever.  NO ONE would let their children ages 2 and 4 see all this happen and not contact them.  

The thing is Drew believes that he is smarter than the cops.  Because he was a cop, he believes he knows how to get around everything.  But - there are no smart prisoners in prison.  If they were so smart, they would have committed a perfect crime and never been caught.  He will get his.
I also would like to know what happened to wives 1 & 2
He was 47 years old when he started having affair with a 17 year old. He was old enough to be her father. I am convinced that he had something to do with her disappearance and the death of wife#3.  DEATH PENALTY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It seems strange to me that shortly after he was denyed his motion to pay less child support to wife #3, she "drowned", in her bathtub, of all places. And, shortly after wife #4 decided she was going to leave this jerk, she "dissapears". There are also reports that both women stated that they were afraid of him to outside parties. I'm not sure about the rest of the world, but I will never warn that my future death will not be an accident without appropiate cause.
it would be great if wife number 1 & 2 come out and talk. like that we would have an idea what kind of person he was with them.  I believe he is quilty.
it would be great if wife number 1 & 2 come out and talk. like that we would have an idea what kind of person he was with them.  I believe he is guilty.
This creep was 47 years old when married to wife #3 and at the same time he was dating then 17 year old wife #4.  Does that qualify as rape?  Soon after divorcing wife #3 he marries wife #4 and wife #3 winds up dead in her bathtub.  Oh by the way, Sgt. Peterson got $1 million in insurance money from the death of #3 which may now actually be a homocide.  Peterson kept referring to both #3 and #4 as mental whack jobs in his interview with Matt Lauer.  That's right Sgt. blame the victims.  If I were related to #4 and it's proven that he offed her - this scumbag would be short lived. I hope he rots in prison as a bitch on the bunk beds of Bubba and Big Daddy! That would serve him right to be raped daily for the rest of his miserable life.
EXACTLY... I GOOGLE MAPPED HOMETOWN. THERE ARE TONS OF BODIES OF WATER HE COULD'VE DUMPED HER BODY. I WONDER WHAT THEY AREN'T SAYING, LIKE WHERE HE WENT THAT NIGHT AFTER PHONE CALL ETC... DOESN'T TAKE A GENIUS TO FIGURE OUT HE'S GUILTY, HOPEFULLY THERE'S CLOSURE SOONER RATHER THAN LATER. LIKE FINDING HIM GUILTY IN OFFING WIFE #3 AND HIM CONFESSING TO #4.
I don't have information about wife #1 and #2, however I can imagine that if they share children, they might not be so quick to publicly expose him that might damage their children even more.
you're all fooling yourselves if you think a woman can't/won't walk out on her children or family & not tell anyone. you want him to be guilty because you can't accept (or don't want to)that a young, attractive woman can be evil or ugly or just do bad things. why would she tell anyone and have to deal with the guilt that will be laid on her for not taking responsibility? that would ruin the party! i don't know if this man did it or not and i don't believe that just because his is a sgt. that  he knows what to do to keep from getting caught. if that is the case, then nothing will come out of exhuming the 3rd wife. one does not think clearly when killing unless one has done it before or is a psychopath.
all these people who think a mother would not leave her kids are wrong!i speak from experience.......was 5 years before any of her kids heard from her. just cuz she has children and left, does not mean he had anything to do with her disappearance. tho it strikes me as odd, that him being a cop and all is not out trying to track her down????  
Personally all of you who says he is guilty are judging him already. I'm not. Not until he is proven to have done it. I think something funny is going on, but no one can prove anything yet. Guilty, maybe but not until proven to be guilty.
If something is fishy and I say it may be then a true detective will get to the bottom of this.
She started dating him when he was still married and she was only a teen. She is now 23 and he is 53...can you say cop groupie, can you say sugar daddy...SHE'S 23!!!!!
With all the media attention you would think if she ran off with another man and was not dead, that they would make an appearence. They surley would realize that there is no way he could harm them now....shes dead he did it...
In this country, you are innocent until proven guilty.  Thats why we are here, why the soldiers have died in multiple wars since its inception.  The court of public opinion is often full of idiots.  And give me a break, as hard to believe as it may be, I wouldn't put it past any woman to pull a stunt like this, all you people who say it isn't possible have obviously never been on the end of a woman just bailing with no warning.  Some of us have.
Stacey is his 4th wife and he was seeing her while still married and she was 17.  Sex with a minor is a felony.
His 3rd wife Kathleen Savio sent a letter to her district attorney asking for help and saying Drew Peterson had beaten her on many occasions and that she was sure he would kill her.

The local police recorded many domestic violence vists to their home and no charges were ever filed against her husband.  She may have been too scared to press charges, the "code" went to far.  What a crime.

Why haven't we heard from wife#1 and #2.  Are they too scared to talk.

Why hasn't DCFS gone to find out if the young children who are broken hearted that their Mommy is gone.  What is he telling them.

Those children need an advocate to protect them from the lies.  They need their aunt to hold them and kiss them and make it all better. (Even if it is a facade)  They are 4 & 2, someone must give them hugs and kisses and make them smile, someone must take them out of that house of so many memories.

There are no words to describe how horrible this man is.  Four woman, four children, they will never be the same.  I hope for justice but he is too clever for the law.

Why not get a pshchic investigator involved to find her? Someone like Sylvia Brown for example. Then the truth will be found.
what a coincidence that his 3rd wife fell and drowned before the divorce settlement. He probably was going to end with no money to spend with Stacey. Also as law enforcement SGT he was breaking the rules having an affair with a 17 year, what else can you expect he is Guilty, they should investigate if he was having a current affair that Stacey was in the way.  
If one needs to confirm that the majority of Americans are half-wits, one has only to read the comments posted about stories like this.  Let the system work, please, and keep your pop psychology and TV-drenched sleuthing skills at rest for awhile. I've got five bucks that bets that those who have decided this guy is guilty are overweight, underexercised, and talk loudly on their cell-phones...and have forgotten how to spell words in English.
Guilty.....since he is now a suspect they have enough but are leaving him out right now as they gather more evidence and see if he slips.  Just by going on the Todays show he is showing signs of desperation.  They have a pretty good timeline of the hours in which he had time to get rid of her. They probably have a good idea if he killed her at the house or not. I would check the secluded areas that he was familiar with when he was working as a police officer. That is where she is and that could be miles from the house. He's showing confidence that they won't find her but they will.  They need to because the kids are living with a Double Murderer. The two older boys have to be suspicious, they are certainly old enough.  He needs to go down soon.  Don't be surprised if you see the arrest happen very soon.
u all ASSUMING that he is guilty...thought this country was that you were "innocent until proven guilty"
His interview: "She'll either go deeper underground or surface"??? Calling Dr. Freud!!!
For those of you who keep saying a mother would never walk out on her children, YOU KNOW NOTHING!

My best friend had his first wife walk out on him and their 3 kids all under the age of 4 while he was laying in the hospital with a broken back wondering if he would ever walk again.

That was 10 years ago. She hasn't attempted to see the kids once! I also know of two other instances of mothers walking out on their children and not resurfacing until many years later.

So YES, a mother will walk out on her kids.
Peterson's interview spoke volumes to me.  He was quick to point his finger at the women in his life who are either dead or missing... The nutty women syndrome... It appears he's rather protective of that pension of his.  Wife #3 was about to get her share of it when she drowned; wife #4 found the courage to leave; alerted her oh so controlling husband, and poof; she vanishes into thin air... something smells here... I'm curious to learn what wives one and two have to say
I am not sure of his guilt but I am sure of that he is a child molester.What would a 50 something man need a 17 year old girl for? Where were her parets and family that she ended up marrying this molester?
There is moe to this story than meets our eyes but I hope he knows that God sees everythig.  
He studdered on the Today show when asked if she may have taken off with someone else.  First said no then said 'Yah she said there was someone else.  He is definitely lying.
It would seem that many Americans are willing to dispense with the notion that a man is innocent until proven guilty. Let's wait for an indictment and trial before condemning anyone.
Drew Peterson did not kill his wife #3 & wife #4. He paid somebody to do it for him.  That is my believe.
No one knows all the facts in this case. Everyone seems to use their preconceived notions that the man is guilty and the poor woman is the victim. There are a lot of psycho women out there that would take off for attention. Look at the run away bride for example. How dare you publicly say someone is guilty of murder without knowing all the evidence!
This guy is crazy.He is guilty as any other killer.
'Guilty' is legal term - he hasn't even been charged, let alone tried yet (except by you folks).  I wouldn't think any 'reasonable' mother would leave her children, but I also wouldn't believe any mother would kill her children, or cut a fetus from another woman's womb, etc. - but we all know that has happened, and even more recently than the last Peterson debacle.  I don't KNOW much about these people; I HOPE she is physically well (although likely mentally challenged, if she willingly abandoned her children).  Does anyone else believe the world could use more HOPE and LESS conviction on appearance (isn't that how we got into IRAQ?, and why celebrities make billions while others struggle to eat?)?  Maybe he did domething horrible, maybe not - what would you say to their kids now?  Mommy's dead and Daddy did it?  MORE LIKELY THAN NOT, justice will be served, no matter what else anyone says.  Let it happen, show some faith on the way there.
There have been cases where women killed their children just to continue an affair. Next question would be, how many women just walk away from their kids for the same reason. There are still a lot of unanswered questions concerning the case. I agree that there are many similarities between wife #3 and #4 but at this time it is all circumstantial. If it proven that wife #3 died from accidental causes, there goes the theory that he killed wife #4 since he had 1,000,000 reasons to kill wife #3. You have no body, no weapon and almost no motive. Besides in this country you are considered innocent until you are proven guilty. Anyone who has convicted him in the court of public opinion has/is denying him a fair trial if they indict him
I'm convinced that the internet does more to destroy faith in humanity than any other medium... you people are ridiculous. I honestly can't believe the sheer stupidity of the comments on here. You're writing this man off as guilty of a double homicide because of your "insights" into human nature? Congratulations, Susan and Vanessa, your Ph.Ds in criminal profiling are in the mail. God, you people are frightening. Do they have an IQ test before you can get on a jury?
I thought it was innocent until PROVEN guilty??? I am curious about wives 1 & 2. But as the one person commented women leave their kids all the time and leave them with dads, grandparents etc. I work in social services and see it day in & day out so it is possible and not all girls have "girl talk" with someone they just up and leave.
A big part of me is putting this together and has become very suspicious, but is it because the media has made me that way?  I would like to know all the real facts, and of course without evidence of a crime, we have to be open-minded.  Another thing that bothers me a lot is the other young woman who went missing from the same area.  They never found her either. Hmmmmm. Just a thought.  
Red Flags, my friends. He killed her, and the 3rd wife. He is a typical Narcissist, controlling, combative, manipulative man. One thing he stated that set off the alarms was the comment about the 3 & 4th wives having emotional/mental issues... very typical comment of his kind: Domestic Violence Perp.
Old media hype. "If it bleeds it leads". John Gasey would be so jelous.
I don't know what to believe, but I would like a little information about wives 1 and 2, and why was he married so many times.  Can you share the information about wives 1 and 2.  Thank you
The reason his first two wives haven't been addressed is because nothing suspicious happened to them. The first wife has refused to comment, the second wife's family is refusing to comment, also, which leads me to believe that she may have died of natural causes subsequent to the divorce. Reading these posts is disheartening, because it is apparent that the concept of "innocent until proven guilty" has completely vanished. We sit in smug judgment, advocating taking his children from him, declaring him a monster. I have no idea; maybe he is. Or maybe he's just the unluckiest person in the world, despite coming from (somewhere near) Chicago, and  his last name being Peterson - what an indictment! Let the wheels of justice turn. Leave him, and his neighborhood and his family, alone. All those scintillating shots of him walking in and out of his house are not serving the public interest, just feeding the media beast.
IT'S NOT THE FIRST TIME A COP GETS AWAY WITH MURDER


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):