ABOUT THIS BLOG

In Field Notes, NBC News will shed light on the stories that don't always make the headlines as well as offering analysis on the big and small stories of the day.

Regular contributors include NBC News correspondents, producers and staff based in bureaus across the country and on assignment.

Click here to read more about the journalists behind this blog.



Will Galveston learn from history?

Posted: Thursday, September 25, 2008 9:07 AM

Hurricane Ike

GALVESTON, TEXAS – Galveston was nearly wiped off the map by a September storm.

I’m not talking about this month’s devastating storm; I mean the Great Storm of 1900.

At the turn of the 20th century, Galveston was the largest city in Texas. It rivaled New York as a center of trade and commerce. Its port was one of the largest and busiest in the country.

Nothing, it seemed, could stop Galveston’s glowing future. Except a nameless hurricane that hit the island on Sept. 8, 1900.

A view of the wreckage after Hurricane C
SLIDESHOW: Galveston's weathered past
Isaac Cline, a meteorologist with the nascent U.S. Weather Bureau, tried to warn Galveston residents on that warm, late summer day in 1900. He had noticed that barometric pressure readings along the Gulf Coast had been dropping dramatically.

When water began rising in the streets – just as it had hours before Hurricane Ike’s arrival – Cline walked along Galveston’s beaches trying to warn people to leave.

Few listened.

Six thousand people died in a harrowing night of wind, rain and storm surge. To this day, the Storm of 1900 remains the nation’s worst natural disaster. So numerous were the bodies that they were put on barges and carried out to sea to a watery grave. Others were burned in mass funeral pyres. More than 3,000 buildings were destroyed, including a hospital, numerous schools and an orphanage.

Seawall – not enough
In the wake of such a horrible calamity, many people questioned the wisdom of rebuilding on an island barely above sea level.

But the same advantages that drew early settlers here were still in place: a prosperous port and an established trade center. In 1900, that was enough of a reason for survivors to build an engineering landmark: a concrete seawall seven miles long. They also raised the level of the island 17 feet behind the seawall.

VIDEO: Panoramic movies of Galveston's 1900 hurricane

After the island survived powerful hurricanes in 1915 and again in 1919, island residents must have felt invincible. More recent storms, such as Carla in 1961 and Alicia in 1983, added to the confidence that somehow Galveston could survive any storm.

All that has changed with Hurricane Ike. People who live just blocks from the seawall learned to their surprise that their homes can be flooded with storm surge from the opposite direction – the northern part of the island is not protected by the seawall. In the historic downtown district, Ike’s 11 foot storm surge was the highest since the storm of 1900.

Then, as now, city leaders vow to rebuild, but with an eye toward higher building elevations – even behind the seawall – and tougher wind-resistant construction.

Hurricane Ike has reminded everyone here that the seawall, though tough and enduring, is not enough to protected Galveston from a painful past.

Click here for complete coverage of Hurricane Ike

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Why does the government; federal, state, and local, allow folks to build in such areas? It isn't just Galveston, the problem exists across the entire U.S. I live in, "tornado alley". Is there a safe place to exist?
move dummy
NO, THE AMERICAN PUBLIC IS JUST RETARDED!!!! New Orleans and Galveston proves it.  Historically, these areas get hit by a major storm every 30-40 years...what the hell is wrong with people?
A wise old man once said "if you live by the sea then someday you will live in the sea"
There are several other news articles today about how people are donating less for Ike than Katrina. This article inadvertently explains why, I think. I will no longer donate money to help people who just go back to live in the same dangerous place. They are idiots and deserve no help.
no duh. We need to drop the pay we give to administrators. Especially the Cheif Adminstrator, or as the rest of you call him/her, the president. Language is powerful, adminstrator is more fitting and conveys more closey the reality that the person performing the job, is just that, a high level employee. He/She doesn't get to stop listening to us after the vote, the way the president today can. I supply this post with capital (taxes) and relinquish responsibility ( power) so that he may execute proper improvements to our governing system. I would expect any competent Adminstrator to learn from the mistakes of the past and the superiority of any competition, to grasp it as our own superficial doctrine. Canada is right now the greatest country on earth, running on 6 yrs now, all because the GOP dropped the ball. That's not un-patriotic, it's the truth. I'm a proud american,but I will not be subdued by blind and arrogant patriatism. I would also like to stop electing officials and adminstrators with no social experience. Being first in line and afforded the best of the best without ever really having to compete is ridiculous. A society that toughts competion as being the defining principle in what reforms society, coming from a group of people who actively try to limit the number of families and which economic class they derive from for the presidency and higher offices, judicial positions is offensive. I think we should all retain a part of our ballot,and if it becomes clear that not only through the "polls" a president is FIRED, but that people could recind their vote , basically handing the pres a pink slip. impeachments are done by others who likely didn't earn their stripes just inherited them and likely based on seperate personal stake, not the community interest.
Your information regarding Isaac Cline makes for interesting reading. If you want to know the
full story however regarding the 1900 hurricane and his role, there is a book called Isaacs Storm. I don't think you have read it which you should if want your story to be clear and concise. Respectfully yours.
When are people going to learn? Billions in damage again. The whole section of the country that builds near the coast from TX to FL costs the US billions every year. Either make the buildings capable of surviving a Cat 5 or don't build. I for one am tired of my tax dollars bailng out people that don't have enough sense to build on high ground or build wind resistant dwellings.
I'd let them rebuild - but they'd have to sign a paper saying that they knew the dangers, knew they'd not get insurance on their homes, and understand that if anything else happens, federal $ wouldn't be used to fix Galveston.
I watch the news every evening and I am astonished how little attention this disaster is getting.  Strike up another dibacle from Bush and FEMA (Faux Emergency Management Agency).  I know the priority is the economy, but what about the people in the Galveston-Houston area.  It's getting hard to be proud of my country.  Thank God for our Soldiers, our only saving grace.
Unfortunately humans do not know their history about anything and when warned "just don't get it" that nature can be more than they have experienced.  Until we become enlightened about current and present danger being a reality then humans will continue to suffer.  It has been said that students that drop out of being constructive in society should be rescued.  This not the case and they suffer their own demise. Not to worry about those that drop out because immigrants, social upward mobility by others, move up and fill the void.  Conclusion of being stupid and getting killed only provides opportunities to others.  We are referred to as stupid Americans by much of the world and the failure to flee from danger reinforces this fact.  
Solution: extend the seawall, on all four sides of the main city.  limit/control construction outside the protected area, and get used to the idea that even with the best engineering solutions humanly possible, nature will come up with something that will beat Galveston down again sometime.  But not for good - not in the past and not now.  that's the lesson of the past, and the present.
I too live in tornado alley and have former relatives in Galveston. These are proud people who will rebuild their lives, most of them having been there since birth. As for the "visitors" and vacation house owners who built the houses on stilts, they shouldn't be allowed to rebuild. There has to be some sanity here and Texas does have laws to help with morons who want to build their house above the waves. It would be nice if the government focused on these people instead of bailing out banking institutions who made bad decisions.
Natural disasters occur in all parts of our country and the world. There is no truly safe place to live since the earth is a living organism that will surprise you just when you've become complacent enough to let your guard down. We must all pay attention to the meteorologists and emergency managers when they tell us to evacuate, and keep emergency supplies of water, batteries, canned foods, granola bars, etc. at home since one never knows when they will be needed.
Maybe a little overreaction here.  So, we had a horrible storm in 1900 and again in 2008....and everyone is upset because they want to rebuild.  My God, it's over 100 years.
Does this mean we don't build houses in Kansas and Oklahoma because they can be hit by tornados, or we don't build houses in California because they can have horrible fires or earthquakes.  Heck, Long Island was hit by a hurricane some 20 years ago...do we move out of NYC?
I agree somewhat....anything new must meet the newest building codes...that is an expense the homeowner must bear.  Look at all the newer houses that did just fine...still intact, no water.  Ditto flood insurance...people seem to think that the government just gives folks unlimited money....do they realize that flood insurance is capped at $250,000....that guys with the million dollar house is on the hook for most of the damage.
Great dialog...just don't overreact.
Move people inland, even if a new city must be created, and turn the island into a wonderful national park.  People could come and play, enjoy the ocean and beach. Whenever these storms hit, as they will, the cost would be minimal in comparison to what the cost for rebuilding is now.  
mark, I read comments like yours and I am astonished at how many people these days think that the government should be everyone's sugar daddy, and take care of everything for them, and that they have no responsibility to take care of their own affairs.
In an ownership society, those who build in places that historically have suffered at the hands of nature should bare the responsiblity for their property. It is part of the RepubliCain platform. Those living in Montana should not have to incur additional expenses for insured liability on these properties, cities, and states. The losses in Galveston should be borne by the residents and owners of those properties collectively and not spread the losses over the entire nation or multinational corporate entities. Taxpayers at the federal level should not pay. No one should be allowed to create such risk without demonstrable abiltiy to cover the loss of said property through escrowed cash or pooled resources with others whose properties are also in the risk zone.
The constant repetition of loss in flood zones in the nation is insulting. Those responsible for flood zones need to prohibit construction or at least create public places for everyone to enjoy so losses are reduced to trash cans and picnic tables.
I certainly don't know what the solution is, but I for one would not rebuild there if I was a resident of Galveston. Clearly we simple humans can not overcome nature. Living at or below sea level has it's risks, as New Orleans and Galveston residents can attest. When we get too cocky and think we have outsmarted the weather, we are struck with horrible tragedy.

If you live in either of these cities (or anywhere else where the ravages of uncontrollable nature strike frequently): think very hard about the risks you are taking. When the next big storm hits, you have been warned. If history is any gauge, you can not rely on the government to rescue you. This is sad and unfair and frustrating, but true none the less. Based on the public's response to this devastation, many people feel you made a bad choice to live there, and they are not willing to fund further rebuilding efforts with tax dollars, much less increase federal money for rescue efforts for people they feel got themselves in to this mess. Sorry to be harsh, but people need to know the truth. ( By the way, I don't know if I agree with these sentiments, but that doesn't make them go away)
You would not understand why people return to Louisiana and Texas after each hurricane because you are not from the area and do not understand the importance of our history and culture.  Every area around this beautiful country suffers from natural disasters.  The people in California have fires, mudslides, etc.  The people in the midwest have tornados and rivers that flood.  The people in the north have blizzards and snowstorms.  Hurricane Katrina so greatly effected New Orleans because of man-made hurricane levees which failed.  Until the Federal Goverment replaces the coastal wetlands that they so freely took from Louisiana and Texas by allowing oil companies to drill without any rebuilding or compensation to the people who live along there.  Everyone of you people who have criticized the people who live in Louisiana and Texas have benefited by the oil and gas drilled off of these coasts.  Everyone of you also could be hit by some natural disaster at any time.  If our country can afford to spend 700 billion to bail out rich banks, they certainly can spend some money rebuilding the coastal land of the United States of America.
Regardless of mans efforts, Mother Nature will always win out in the end.  There is always the next bigger storm.  It is folly to tempt Mother Nature.
I'm with a lot of you who say if they are willing to live in an area that is this prone to disaster theymust take the risks and quit complaining because my tax dollars don't reach them fast enough in a crisis.  People in New orleans were the same.  It is situatated at the bottom of an artificially dry lagoon and people are astonished when a hurricane wipes it out oh PAAAALLLLEEASE!  Get a clue just like most of the French settlers did - they packed up and moved to high ground.  There is a reason the french quarter survived - as for Galveston - it's a beautiful place but there are risks.  If you want to take them fine but don't expect me to pay for your choice in lifestyle.
While I personally would move to a safer place to live, if yo ustop to think about it, there are not very many of those places.

How many of us live close enough to the coast to get hit by hurricanes, live within Tornado Alley, live along the flood-plains, live in the Northeast where they have brutal blizzards, live in earthquake or mudslide areas, or even near Volcanos?

It seems to me that there is some form of a natural disaster close to where anyone lives.
I have come around to the point where I do not believe my taxes should pay for assistance to people who insist on living in areas prone to hurricanes. They especially should not be used to help in any way individuals who refuse mandatory evacuation orders. This over-extended government simply cannot afford to come to the rescue of people who intentionally place themselves in harm's way. Sorry, you're on your own.
It is so nice to see the compassion of the posters so far.  If I get the gist of the posts, they would like to shut down the entire gulf coast, close the entire state of Florida and up the east coast.  Wonder why no one mentions all the "dummies" who live in the flood prone areas of the mid-west, or in the fire/mud slide sections of California, Arizona, New Mexico, etc.  You like our oil and gas from our refineries, our seafood and the products that come into the ports, but don't rebuild in these areas.  Everyone move to a "safe" area and commute to work to provide these products.  Oh, then it will be said all those dummies along the gulf coast are using too much gasoline.
Oh yeah - I live 1/4 mile from the Potomac...300 feet up at the top of a hill...in a brick house.  Evolution at its finest.
Pay for it yourself. I'm tired of bailing everyone out with my tax dollars.
I know that living beside the ocean is a "dream" for most of us, but people have to realize that every so often, they will lose everything they own and maybe their lives, as well.  A woman's body was found under debris in Galveston yesterday.  These people were warned, even told that they would "die", but some refused to leave.  What are the rest of us supposed to do?  If you choose to live on an ocean, this is what happens and building a silly little house on stilts is what people do in "third world countries".  I'm sorry.  I do not want to foot the bill for these people's bad choices.  All of us would love to live on the ocean, but we don't because we have a BRAIN.
We are wasting taxpayers hard earned dollars rebuilding these homes and business on the coastlines. Most are aware of the dangers, fail to heed the dangers so they should be on there own. I also so if we can spend 700 billion dollars we can spend money to raise the walls on these coast lines, fix our amtrax system, why haven't they finished the work in Louisana after 3 years how long does it take.?
My dad always said, "Give people half a chance to be stupid, AND THEY WILL BE"!!!
Slim, we all do live in places where anything can happen, however we don't live in areas where anything WILL happen.  I feel the same way about people living on river banks all through the MidWest.  I have no sympathy for them when every spring, the river floods and their homes are unlivable.  How ridiculous is that?  Our intelligence is measured by what we learn from our mistakes.
I read in dismay that some are correlating living in 'Tornado Alley' similar to that of living by the sea.  Maybe I'm naive here, but a tornado, if I'm not mistaken, will not and cannot cause the same of amount of damage as a Hurricane.  Also, most everywhere is prone to being hit by a tornado in this country.  You may live in 'Tornado Alley' all your life and never be struck by a tornado; however, living in areas such as New Orleans, Outer Banks, Charleston, The Keys, Galveston, St. Simons Island, and the like, you are just asking for punishment and time after time, these areas get destroyed and are rebuilt at the TAXPAYERS expense.  Even if you choose to rebuild in these areas and sign a waiver, taxpayers, charitable org.'s, atate & fed. gov's would still be burdened.  The state and fed. gov. should just ban people from rebuilding in these destruction prone regions.  Don't get me wrong, I feel for the people who have lost their homes, businesses, and loved ones, but enough is enough.
Thank you Dave K. One's home is one's home within SOME boundary of reason. I notice most of the "writers" live a long way inland. Galveston is a relativaley poor city which has a very restful feel to it. There are "events" and then people go elsewhere. I know people there and they're not pulling up stakes yet. Nor would a lot of you if it were your homes.
Who's going to refine the gasoline for your precious automobiles when all the "dummies" move away from the Gulf Coast?  The entire U. S. has benefitted from the destruction of the Gulf Coast by Big Oil -- the real reason why hurricanes in the last three decades or so have been so damaging is because all the OIL COMPANIES have killed the expanses of cypress trees and wetlands that used to protect the coast from storm surge and slow down storms that blew through. By the way, by the logic of the non-"retarted" contributors of these comments, I guess no one should live where there are fires, floods, tornados, hurricanes, blizzards, etc...  I guess we all need to go live in a space station.  Natural diasters happen everywhere.  You are all IDIOTS.  You really need to educate yourselves before you open your mouths or start typing.
Yeah, people leaving and never rebuilding there would be just what a lot would want. Then the land can be bought up for pennies on the dollar and bunch of very expensive money-machine resorts could be built.
Carolyn,

I appreciate your sentiment. I am not trying to belittle your culture and heritage. I was simply trying to convey the reality of the situation (i.e. that another storm will come, FEMA will be inadequate, people will wait for months/years to get their insurance payments, flood and wind insurance will go up for everyone, people will complain about those who rebuilt anyway despite the risks, etc). This will not change.

As an aside, I am from the desert, where the annual rain fall was less than 10 inches. Water was prized, and every summer when we had difficulty in maintaining the water supply, and we were forced to ration it, people got upset. Anywhere you choose to live has inherent risks (and benefits) based on the geography. One must honestly assess these risks and determine if they are willing to accept them, and can personally bear the consequences without government assistance. If one is unwilling/unable to shoulder the known risks of any particular geographic location, they can not simply rely on others to "rescue" them from a fate they chose. I had "culture" and "heritage" in the desert, but frankly got tired of being hot, thirsty and having to limit my showers and not having anything green growing in my yard. I knew that it would be inevitable that the water shortage would some day become more than an "inconvenience"- (i.e. millions of people in sweltering heat of summer with no water). I moved to somewhere that the risk of any kind of natural disaster was less. This was a hard decision, but I had a choice, as you and your family do. So, whatever you choose to do, please do it with your eyes open. I sincerely wish you the best, and hope you can build (or rebuild) a life that is safe, with risks you can both understand and afford.
People, have a heart!  I know times are tough all around.....but what if this was you.  What if everything you loved and cherished was wiped out...nothing left.  Yes, Galveston will get hit again...yes, Florida and Lousianna will get hit again.  But do not beat these people up anymore than Ike has.
Some of you are just plain heartless, disrespectful, and should be ashamed of yourselves.  How dare you criticize the people of any city hit by any disaster, natural or man-made. If you were in the same position, no matter what the cause (and there are many) you would expect to be helped back to your feet to either move and start over, or stay and live in the place you know and love.  
Some education for those unfamiliar with Galveston...it is not at, or below sea level.  It is actually between 3 and 15 feet above sea level depending on your location on the Island.  Whereas, New Orleans is a bowl, and bowls fill with water from time to time, but people live there because it's their home.  And you question their intelligence in the matter?  You are great example of a person that is uncaring and selfish.  I'm sure your parents would be proud, and your kids even more so.  What a role model!
Is there a safe place to live?  It is all relative.  I, for one, do not think any place is immune from a disaster.  Nature runs its course and things happen.  It's nice to know there are those out there who sympathize, empathize,care, and help.  It's sad to know there are those who would love to see others suffer without help,without hope, and without money to rebuild and move on.  This mentality of, "Nothing happened to me, why should I help?" is pathetic and un-American.  

May God bless those affected by Ike, and may a speedy recovery filled with comfort from others fill the victims with hope.

To my family and friends of Galveston Island...do not let the selfishness of others bring you down.  Let it light a fire of strength to rebuild your lives.  

Much Love,
LP
I say if you want to live in a hazardous area, that's your business as long as you don't send me the bill when disaster strikes
Although I do agree that stupidity should not be financially rewarded, I feel that some comments left on this site are not well thought out, to put it politely. Several have mentioned preventing people from inhabiting Galveston or more broadly, from Florida to Texas coastline because of natural disaster potential. Hmm, let’s explore this; don't build where there is potential for natural disaster? Let’s see, that would pretty much take care of the Atlantic and Gulf Coast. Oh, California and a good deal of the west coast are not safe due to earth quakes. Wait, we’ve got the serious floods in the Midwest this last year, not to mention tornado alley which covers several states. Well, you probably should not live near the Mississippi River, where several large cities are located. Now that we’ve got rid of all of the major shipping ports we’ll pay three times as much for produce, gas and pretty much every product you use that is not grown down the road from you. Better not move too far north because there is potential for some serious snow storms, then again there are ice storms as far south as Houston. Hawaii is definitely out of the question considering they could encounter a tsunami and volcano.  Speaking of volcanoes Washington is probably not a good choice. Obviously Alaska should be a barren state from late September to May because of the arctic conditions, well and angry bears. People would be stupid to live there right.  I wonder if we should also throw man made issues into the mix, like potential health issues due to prolong exposure to smog or maybe even riot potential. That takes care of L.A. three times; smog, riots and earthquakes. I guess we better tell a couple of billion people that they need to move to Prescott, Arizona and migrate to Phoenix in the winter.  A lot of areas are prone to disasters of one kind or another. Disasters are a part of life and unless you want everyone to move in with you, which I’m sure would then create its own disaster, then we will have to deal with it as best as possible.  We are American, diverse and resilient but when we lose compassion we lose what makes us great.
So for those who think people should not live near the sea or the coast (and that we are quote unquote Idiots), I guess that means that practically all of Florida residents should move to other states further inland. not to mention, everyone along the coasts of LA, MS, AL, GA, SC, NC, VA etc should all move too. ya, that's logical & realistic. here's a news flash, IKE affected areas as far inland as OHIO, so don't come at us w/ the coast line damage poor us tax payers blah blah blah. What about people who live in WILD FIRE RISK communities & areas- should they all move too? Please! Guess what, Mother Nature throws stuff at us (PEOPLE) all once in a while. You can't hide from that, you learn to take it like a man & deal w/ it. Be glad most people listened to the warnings & left- so the loss of life casualties were minimal (I can just imagine the critism over that. but b/c that didn't happen some have to find something else to criticize. some people just want to complain or constantly look for examples of being superior on some level or other). Stuff can be replaced, people can't. Thanks for all the support btw- NICE!!! Those who truly are supportive & who are praying, we Thank You w/ from the bottom of our hearts.
Why does everyone think the President (regardless of party affiliation) is personally responsible for everything? People whine because "they" (government) aren't "doing enough".  "They" just don't get it...
WE, ladies and gentlemen are "they"; when the govenment pays for your health care, buys you an education it also supports those who will not work and it's called Socialism; when you put one person in charge it's called a Monarchy, but whether it's Socialism, Monarchy, or Democracy the money, the funding, the bailouts, FEMA,etc, etc, etc,comes out of our pockets. You don't like the help going to the devastated cities, not fast enough for you?  Fill up your gas tank and go help. I wonder how many who whine and complain haven't voted either not for years or never have, and wouldn't recognize volunteerism if it bit you. Rollup your sleeves and quit complaining.
So, Barb, are you going to be ok with the entire state of Florida, AND the entire gulf coasts of AL, MS, LA, and TX moving into Cleveland?  Stressing your public school systems and transit systems and housing systems?  Because what you are advocating here is that ENTIRE states relocate . . . where do you think they are going to go?  I live on the Gulf Coast of AL and have suffered through more than my fair share of hurricanes and we rebuild ourselves when we have damage.  I am not an idiot as so many here are quick to judge and if you needed help because of a natural disaster, you can bet that my neighbors would be first in line to provide it.  We understand community here and we also understand the power of mother nature.  Ya'll all need to think before you are so quick to pass judgment, because what you are advocating may very well just make your lives more difficult, not less.
Move? Have we lost our compasion? The entire gulf coast of the United States is prone to hurricanes...should everyone move out of the gulf coast? Re-read your comments and think twice about what you post prior to hitting submit. Hurricanes are a possibility as are flooding in the midwest, ice storms and blizzards in the north, earthquakes in California. If you can spare a few dollars then do so; go without a $4.00 coffee for a week. Be decent to each other and help if you can because it's your BASIC human responsibility.
How about we shut down all the refineries and drilling platforms in the area and move them to the East Coast. Then we won't need ships pilots who live in Galveston, Clear Lake, LaPorte na all the oil related employers and personnel can move out of the area.
Ohio and the rest of the midwest have to dodged Snow Storms,tornados and floods.   But guess what we don't cry Mommy ever time mother nature shows up.  We know it snows and build a roof over our heads that can take the weight.   We don't build in a flood plane and not buy incsurance.    Tornados don't wipe the same piece of land clear ever 3 or 4 years.   If storm hits I take cover and than rebuild with the insurnace money from a policy I paid for out of my own pocket.    
Born in Orlando, raised in the Mid-west currently live 30mi north of Houston.  Yes, Ike, we lived no power for a week+. Neighbors are still without electricity.
So...I know tornados, floods, hurricanes. Lived (through) them.
Narrow thinkers, Barb C, could be the ONLY people to suggest that you disallow building along the "coast".  If I am not mistaken..The Port Of Houston (in Galveston Bay) is the 2nd largest cargo port in the USA - and growing rapidly.
Hummmmm... so let me think...sure! let's close The Port and send all the people who work there away.
Perfect solution, right?  Make the ships suddenly sprout wings and fly inland where the buildings are allowed to be built and the people are allowed to live.
That turns a hurricane into a Perfect Storm - economically.
Do I think those who were required and SIGNED during their closing a statemenet from their Title insurance company that given this situation - their homes and/or sand would be taken over by the State of Texas - they should be allowed FEMA $$ and no rebuild  NO.  They should accept the possibility of loss the moment they build or purchase in these areas.  Period.  Legally, they have. I do not believe anyone has ever defeated this law passed in TX decades ago.
I just find it sad that self-serving citizens in other states see their fellow American after a disaster as their economic enemy.

Enjoy all the Goods that are imported sitting around in your glass houses.....
How about we put a Texas import tax on all that trucks from The Port to everywhere else - since you reap the benefit of our Port but we are taking the risk of living and working in these forbidden places?  
hmmmmm....?
As Dr. Phil (from TX) would say.... GET REAL.
There should be a 25 mile zone along the shore lines of America that would be classified as a National Monument or Park where no one could permanently live.  If people visit, they need to be either camping there or visit on a daily basis.
No more handouts to people that live in dangerous places.  They are asking for trouble and then asking for money to rebuild.  When the Government pays for a damaged home, we the people should own it and tear it down.  When enough homes are gone from the area, declare it public domain and set up the park.
MOVE SOMWHERE ELSE DON'T REBUILD IN THE SAME PLACE AGAIN.
I live about 50 miles inland from the Gulf of Mexico.  In the last 3 years, communities along the coast have been devastated, yet "they" continue to rebuild on the coast. They expect FEMA and the other goverment agencies to support their rebuilding. I would also allow them to rebuild but sign a document that would prevent them from receiving any government aid. Everyone makes out when a hurricane strikes.  For Katrina and Rita, people that did not need aid were the first ones in line getting food stamps and checks from the Red Cross. I notice that most of these people do not have any insurance. I believe it is not so much that they can't afford it, it is because they have other "priorities", such as eating out on a regular basis, gambling, drinking, etc. Each month I struggle to pay for insurance and when a disaster like this occurs, it usually pays for most of any damages that may occur.  However, the ones who do not have insurance just get their reimbursement from the government. Why should I continue to work so that I can pay for insurance when the ones that do not pay get compensation from the government?
I am so tired of these people's expectations of entitlement. Whatever happen to being responsible for your own self?  I understand that there are people (the sick and elderly) that do need help, but most people receiving aid do not fit into this category.  



SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):