‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Joe, Moreno Valley, Ca — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 22:17:30 GMT

He is an idiot looking for attention and lookiNg to start trouble! He didn't get enough attention as a child, that's why he is still acting like one.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

john williams, Seattle, Wa — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 22:26:15 GMT

OUr country is turning into a policestate, where regular people are afraid to speak there mind with the fear that they can be arrested or even killed at the cost of thier words. Free America!!

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Russ Price — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 22:50:03 GMT

After carefully and repeatedly viewing all three camera angles, I have realized that they merely confirm the inescapable conclusion that I drew when I first heard about this story - Meyer is an idiot.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Wendy, Wisconsin — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 22:58:14 GMT

How scary! The way the officers treated this young man was frightening. What happened to asking questions that are questions most of us are asking? As soon as he asked questions pertaining to impeaching the president his microphone was cut off and he was being arrested. The tazer part was very frightening to watch, causing fear and panic along with painful screams. I really hope these officers can be fired. I wouldn't want police patroling my city that can inflict that kind of a nightmare on anyone. Remember people, we pay them to protect us and act in a reasonable manner. This is United States not some other country that can injure people because of what they say.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Markk Atwood, Seattle WA — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 23:02:17 GMT

What do I think?

That cops who carry a taser be required to take a hit from that taser every morning, as part of putting it on.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

stoolpigeon — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 23:06:21 GMT

Nice - three videos - three commercials. No thanks.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Anthony Wrifford — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 23:17:07 GMT

He apologized for what? He didn't do anything for which to apologize. The cops ought to be apologizing to him and so should the spineless people in the auditorium who didn't help him.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

mlregister adel ga — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 23:17:25 GMT

whats going on bro

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Carl B. Huckleberry, Edinburg, Texas — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 23:19:06 GMT

I think he sould have been allowed to question Kerry for his traitorous remarks against the sailors, solders, and other military personnel that remained in Vietnam (I was one of them. He probably is responsible for the lack of respect for the military, and our President in todays climate. Kerry deserves any criticism he gets. Incidently, Kerry only was in Vietnam 4 months. He wrote his own citations he received.

Chief Petty Officer, U.S. Navy Retired

Chief Petty Offcer, U.S. Navy Retired

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Steve Clapp — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 23:20:01 GMT

The guy yelled louder BEFORE he was tazed. What a fake Will Ferrell scream. He had no ID on him. The whole thing was staged. John Kerry has been anti-war since 1971. Get a clue...BRO!

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

P.F. , WPB, Florida — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 23:25:13 GMT

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Phil, Garwood, New Jersey — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 23:26:46 GMT

I don't believe the University of Florida police should have been exonerated. They tasered a student for asking three questions to former presidential candidate and Mass. Senator John Kerry. Kerry said he was willing to answer the questions. Meyer would not have scuffled with police if they didn't try to tackle him after asking questions. What they did was totally inappropriate.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

James, Corvallis, OR — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 23:29:46 GMT

I don't understand what you are driving at. None of these videos changed my opinion at all?

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

marion hobbs new mexico — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 23:33:06 GMT

cops are getting all to many toys that they are over anxious to use

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Brian Krieger, Tucson, AZ — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 23:33:29 GMT

This is one of the most blatant examples of police brutality I've seen in a long time. It also shows that free speech is for those that can afford it. If you aren't saying what the powers that be want to here you will be punished. Since when did the U.S. turn into cold war Russia

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Anonymous, Anywhere, USA — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 23:35:20 GMT

Wow, that must be why FEMA scripted their quesnd answer session.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Fred Doe, Chicago.Il — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 23:35:52 GMT

give police a taser and they can't wait to try it out on some one.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

John Doe, Granada, MN — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 23:36:32 GMT

Sounds to me like he should copyright the phrase, "Don't taz me bro!" someone will make money off it.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Me — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 23:37:07 GMT

Another case of mistreatment of police!

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

marion hobbs new mexico — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 23:37:22 GMT

four cops holding the man down and still taseing him.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Patti — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 23:41:38 GMT

How very sad to see police acting like animals
- did the policey apologize, they realy should.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Rockett, Puyallup, WA — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 23:48:08 GMT

Freedom of speech? Just watch what you say.........oh, and don;t speak for more than 30 seconds. Oh yeah, and don;t offend a liberal. Other than that.... we're good to go!

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Alan, Orlando, Fl. — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 23:51:06 GMT

Your right, they should not of tased him! They should of rapped him a few times in the head with night sticks!

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

No Name — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 23:51:40 GMT

Still seems like the PO'lice' caused the problem. Whatever happened to free speech? God Save America.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Jill Parker — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 23:55:16 GMT

Being detained or arrested unjustly by police is the same as kidnapping. The speaker was only defending himself from being kidnapped. As we can see here, police have supreme power and are above the law. Vote freedom www.OurVote.us dont let it happen again!

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

ishmael — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 00:03:06 GMT

what the campus police did was wrong on major counts. meyre shouldnt have to apologise. more or less, the campus police should at least be fired. and at most should be arrested for assault and battery on an unarmed student. this is almost like kent state. another version of power abuse

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Gerald Boswell — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 00:05:27 GMT

I feel that someone who is unruly at a public forum should respect the rules that are in place for such a gathering. I also feel that the officers acted justly to tazering this student. He should be punished somehow.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Steve Foster, Salt Lake City, Utah — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 00:07:14 GMT

If we're going to limit free speech, let's limit it. If we're not, let's not.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Alex. Los Angeles, Ca — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 00:07:26 GMT

This guy is just trying to get some media attention. There was nothing wrong in what the cops did.

You can hear him say "they are going to take me away and kill me", which confirms that all he's trying to do is create a publicity stunt.

He should be prosecuted to make sure that people dont attempt stupid things like this anymore.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Anthony Tsardakas, Hamilton, NY — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 00:14:52 GMT

Seems to me that the gov't has forgotten that this free land we call America wasn't founded by being silenced....by anyone! It also appeared as if the 4+ officers had the young man well restrained and yet still found the necessity to use a taser. As a result, there should be 4+ officers in the unemployment lines.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Michael Bufkin, Louisville, Kentucky — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 00:15:45 GMT

Certainly, the 'questioner' was a little obnoxious and was using the invitation to ask a question as an opportunity to hijack the forum and make his own statements. However, five police officers were able to quickly get him to the ground, could have cuffed him, and had him out of the hall in few moments. Instead, they continued to argue with him on the floor of the hall trying to 'calm' him instead of just hustling him out of the hall. Surely, five trained police officers could have quickly taken the unarmed college student out of the hall. Surely, the young man abused the forum, however I don't believe a 'tasing' was at all necessary. I think the police only aggravated the situation.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

joe katz, san diego, CA — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 00:17:58 GMT

stupid. they are all the same. people are now missing the point. what is DISTURBING is that one can be arrested, detained, or silenced simply for SPEAKING. whether your tone is angry or not. we are allowed to be angry. he did nothing wrong. he brought a book, and confronted john kerry at a forum designed to allow students ask questions. he was irate, and with GOOD reason. deal with it.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Scott Nichols, Houston, TX — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 00:21:43 GMT

They say "Don't believe everything you hear, or see"....well as much of a good thing it is to read books, don't believe everything you read either. "Armed Madhouse" is just a book 'bro'. Why not ask Mr. Kerry where the UFO's are too?

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Keats, Walnut Creek, CA — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 00:23:17 GMT

A good rule of thumb for the general sanctity of one's continued existence - when a cop tells you to stop doing something, repeatedly, STOP! They have two options - neither of which will be good for your continued well being. Either physically and violently restrain you, or tase you. And they are absolutely right to do so - they have no way of knowing if you're a threat to them or others.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Dan Hass — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 00:25:45 GMT

He got his four minutes of YouTube stardom, which is all he really wanted. Nobody else cares.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Philip Lundquist, Las Vegas, Nevada — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 00:34:51 GMT

I see no good reason for police to have been at the function in the first place. And, apart from threat to person or property (and there was none, as Andrew Meyer thanked Kerry and everybody else profusely before speaking), theere was no constitutional premise to taser this young man. Now, if you let the police start talking, there will be a problem. Remember, they earn their living not only by thuggery, but by deceit and lies. It is in their blood. America is threatened ever more greatly by police thuggery than by outspoken concerned citizens like Andrew Meyer. I am deeply ashamed that he has apologised. It must have b een part of a brokered deal. Let them try that with me. I'm fresh out of apologies as a 57-year-old citizen, veteran, taxpayer, and knowledgeable person with regard to Government duplicity.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

John Fox, Phoenix, AZ — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 00:41:59 GMT

I think he is a grandstander. Charged?? Not this time. Did the police act appropriately?? Yes. Was constantly combative and would not calm down.

He was there to make a point, not ask questions. It appeared to me he was very nervous when he approached the mike, I think he knew he was about to cause a scene.

But that's just me. I think he needs to study Gandhi more.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Kellyn, Cape Coral, Florida — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 00:42:14 GMT

Granted he was very obnoxious while asking those questions, but sometimes it takes that kind of action to get those questions out there, and to get people thinking. It was most definitely the general manner in which the questions were asked that sparked the resulting action of law enforcement. You can, however, see what appears to be an important figure nodding to law enforcement as if he's asking them to "cut him off" as a result of his controversial questions. I feel as if he was intentionally silenced to prevent controversy. If that's true, he should be awarded a medal and more should follow in his footsteps.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

a a , a a — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 00:48:09 GMT

i find it disgusting that this supposed news story is no more than an advertisement for a tv show.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Bronwyn Llywellyn, Inver Grove Heights, Minnesota — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 00:53:59 GMT

so what do the videos show exactly that exonerated the police?? why would they not get punished for tasing someone that only wanted to ask a question of someone that was there to answer questions????

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Chris, Tacoma, Wa — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 00:55:58 GMT

It appears our first ammendment rights no longer apply. Boo to the "investigators" for finding no wrong doing. I love the 300 lb cop twisting his hand behind his back while the kid is cuffed, and saying "stop resisting." He probably beats his wife and claims "she had it comming."

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Charlie Anderson, Boone NC — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 00:56:07 GMT

I watched all of the video clips and arrived at the same conclusion: This man, while obnoxious, was exercising his right to free speech and was assaulted by police officers.

From the point where they attacked him and attempted to forcibly remove him from the auditorium his rights were violated. How anyone can defend this is beyond me.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Shawn Thompson, Dagsboro, DE — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 01:02:01 GMT

Just don't Tase me, bro!

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

C GEBHART — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 01:04:37 GMT

PUT A TASER GUN CAMERA ON ALL TASER WEAPONS AND THEN SEE WHAT WAS HAPPENING TO THE IN CUSTODY INDIVIDUAL,ANDREW MEYER.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

GW, Charlottesville, VA — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 01:06:23 GMT

Shame on MSNBC for presenting this as some inane "Don't tase me, bro" humor story. Regardless of how obnoxious the college student is, the police (or campus security, whatever the case) had no right to lay their hands on him. He was exercising his First Amendment rights and posed no threat to anyone. The police clearly overreacted, and I would even go so far as to characterize their conduct as brutality.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

John Donofrio — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 01:12:29 GMT

Another example of suppressed free speech. We might as well move to a third world country where at least there's no impression that we have the ability to speak freely. I certainly hope that he sues the UPD for bunches of money for their false imprisonment. As a UF graduate I am sickend by the actions of UPD.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Baron Brown, Clarkston, MI — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 01:18:47 GMT

I've been tased. It is an instantaneous wave of pain that subsides almost immediately after the shocking stops. Make no mistake about it, it hurts bad. But the yells of agony by Meyer is clearly done for the dramatic effect. It's always a good idea to resist the police when one is being arrested......especially if one is performing for the camera in order to gain their fifteen minutes.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Owen Hughes - Albany NY — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 01:20:08 GMT

It was obvious from the get go that Myers is a fledgling phoney "Journalist"....I'm sure he's earned his spurs and can now take his place amongst all the other media whores who dominate the airwaves selling toilet paper and all manner of assorted crap.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Another opressed US citizen, Texas, USA — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 01:37:04 GMT

Another example of government opression!!! Why was he tasered when he was already in hand cuffs? Did anyone notice how the female cop did not want the cameras around? It's funny how cops hate cameras.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

gary ricin — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 01:37:20 GMT

...Sorry. Don't get what it is you're trying to do here. What do you mean "What do you think?"

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

SICK of INJUSTICE!! — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 01:37:58 GMT

Ya know, I don't understand WHAT the cops' problem was... I watched all 3 videos and not one of them showed me WHY they pounced him. They kept interrupting him for apparently "taking too long" with his "question." Well, TOO BAD there, police... The guy is ENTITLED to USE HIS FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS and if it takes a little longer than some assinine "time limit" or if he isn't conforming to what YOU think he should be, that doesn't matter - to interfere with him while utilizing his CONSTITUTIONALLY PROVIDED RIGHTS TO FREE SPEECH is a VIOLATION of that right plain and simple!!!! Now, perhaps he too overreacted, but once he realized that they were going to go the route they did, it's understandable for him to "freak out" a little bit. If they would've BACKED OFF a little, surely he would've calmed down too. I cannot BELIEVE they were charging him with "inciting a riot!" That CHARGE should've done it... The fact that they TASERED HIM should've done it!! I may not agree with his language, or what he had to say, but he had the RIGHT to be there and say what was on his mind - or does the CONSTITUTION not APPLY on college campuses???!!! He could've reacted differently to the police's actions, but when people are stressed or in total disbelief, he reacted in a completely normal manner to that disbelief. He should NOT have jerked away from the cops, but they SHOULD NOT have been pawing at him in the FIRST PLACE!!! He only starting acting stupid when they started screwing with him... And there was NO GOOD REASON for them to screw with him in the FIRST PLACE. They were too busy throwing their weight around to hear John Kerry tell everyone to just settle down and he was going to answer the question. Everyone had to escalate the situation to a FAR WORSE LEVEL than it ever should have been. It truly saddens me that people feel it necessary to do such things. This kid should NOT have had to apologize - the COPS should have - at the very least the cops should have had to apologize IN ADDITION to this kid! The kid could and should very well have settled down and not acted the way he did. He should have just shut up and left or at the very least let them make their little collar and then he could've sued them for false arrest.

But for the FDLE to say there was "no wrong doing" or whatever is a crock. I know how this is going to sound, and I honestly hate to bring up this issue on yet ANOTHER story, but we all know it's the truth: If this had been a BLACK kid, you better BELIEVE the cops would've been the ones to apologize and the kid's family would've GOTTEN PAID. Not trying to be "racist" but it is a well-known fact in this country that whether or not a person is right, wrong or indifferent, if they're black and something like this happens, Jesse Jackson, the NAACP, and about a thousand others jump on it and claim some kind of discrimination, racism, the KKK or SOMETHING ELSE was involved. So, where are Jesse and his cohorts now? Injustice is injustice - I thought he was all about "human rights" and all that garbage... I guess it's just the black community he and his posse care about, huh? It just goes to show that "whites" suffer injustice too, but it's OK because they're white. This is just a sickening story and it's stories like this that make me ashamed to be an American!

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Dan, Hunterdon County, NJ — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 01:39:23 GMT

The police were clearly wrong, and this is yet another example of how free speech is being restrained at political events by overly aggressive police using force to subdue political dissent. Anyone who doesn't ask softball questions is quickly dragged from the event and arrested. Are our politicians so fragile that they cannot handle dissent? This man was not violent. He posed no threat to either Kerry or the audience. Yes, he resisted arrest, but the arrest was unjust and unnecessary. Dragging him away, zapping him with electricity and charging him with inciting a riot is a breach of all our rights, and a dangerous sign of what happens to you if you disagree with the pablum our current crop of politicians are producing.

The other camera views show nothing different than the first view, only that he resisted arrest, but offer no insight into why the police initiated the arrest in the first place.

If our politicians don't want free speech to occur at their speaking engagements and want to be protected from difficult questions by police who abuse their powers, then perhaps they should hold their events at closed door sessions where only hand-picked docile invitees can attend so as not to embarass them with questions to which we would all like to hear the answers.

I agree with the questioner. If Kerry is so opposed to the Iraq war, where the hell has he been for the last four years as 4K of our soldeirs were killed and 20K maimed for a war about WMD that never existed. Now we're told they're dying for Iraqi freedom. Our sons are dying needlessly to line the pockets of Bush and Cheney's friends who own the companies that are providing billions of dollars of private services in Iraq.

It's disgusting and shameless, and someone needs to ask our politicians, especially the Democrats, when they plan on getting off their lazy asses and doing something about the Bush administration.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Nancy Crayton, Sammamish, WA — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 01:41:31 GMT

He was so much larger than the woman police officer who first tried to remove him from the microphone and his violent arm swings were threatening to her. He had no business resisting. He got exactly what he deserved. Obviously, this young man was never disciplined by authority figures when he was growing up. He apparently did not understand the meaining of the word "NO".

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

James J. Chevalier, Ballston Lake NY — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 01:52:40 GMT

It seems like the taser has become the torture device of choice, the easy option rather than the last resort. Did he have a weapon? Did he violently assault people in an out of control rage? No. So why the taser? It's use has gone down the slippery slope from danger of uncontrollable physical violence to dangerously uncomortable speech we don't want to listen to. There's nothing more silencing to speech than an electronic jolt.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Sean Lammers, Kansas City, MO 64111 — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 02:06:36 GMT

Why don't you get a clue-our Freedom of speech and right to dissent is under fire. Since George Bush has taken office in 2000-our very freedoms are being crushed!!!This is evidence, that some day freedom of speech will be gone and will be an offense you will be tried and convicted and jailed on. Wake up people!

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Bob, Orlando,Florida — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 02:14:12 GMT

Of course the police were exonerated. Did we exspect anything less?

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Graham, Portland OR — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 02:14:54 GMT

Both sides went too far, and the actions of each side do not negate the others.
The security personnel should not have shocked him after seeing his reaction to the sight of the taser, and doing it in the middle of the crowd like that was a poor choice.
The kid should not have resisted being removed, and certainly should not have fought back so vigorously. Authority needs to be respected; even if he thought that they were enforcing a stupid policy, the people doing the enforcing aren't the ones to be arguing with. If shoving them away worked, there wouldn't be any purpose to their presence. He should have known that physically resisting was going to have negative consequences. If he had just walked away when asked, everything would have been fine.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Mary, Kansas City, MO — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 02:24:34 GMT

It is unthinkable that a student asking questions - even uncomfortable ones - at a college forum would be drug off by armed agents, let alone subjected to tasing (when he was already on the ground and being held down and surrounded) in a "free" country. Amerika has become a police state. Notice how they grabbed him from behind when he said "skull and bones" (that's a group we should all be worried about). He told them he would leave, but they insisted on putting him under arrest. Many people die in cutody in Florida under dubious circumstances and charges are rarely filed against police - oh yeah, they investigate themselves! The juries they pick almost always acquit if they are charged (remember the 14 yr old who was beaten to death on tape?)so police brutality is rampant. Wake up, sheep!! What liberty are our soldiers dying for? What happened to protect and serve? Who was protected? He wasn't a threat to anyone, except the Skull and Bones crowd that are running our political system!

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

keith fabrique — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 02:27:06 GMT

A similar event occurred during a talk by G. Gordon Liddy @ Northern Illinois University in Dekalb IL in the 1980's. Myself and friends controlled the demonstrators on our own in order to to hear the discussion. The Unicops backed off. The talk went on as scheduled. It was a great day for free speech.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

ES, Charlotte, NC — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 02:27:11 GMT

This is just a typical example of liberal colleges who indoctrinate their students and impose their elitist wills on anyone that disagrees with them.

Our colleges are teaching our children to be pansies. What if we had another World War II? Are our pansy college kids going to roll over and let us lose? I'd bet they would. It's time we take back our country from the enemy within.

"A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known, and he carries his banners openly. But the traitor moves among those within the gates freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very hall of government itself. For the traitor appears no traitor. He speaks in the accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their garments, and he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in hearts of men. He rots the soul of a nation. He works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of a city. He infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A Murderer Is Less To Be Feared." Cicero, 42 B.C.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

John Steinauer, Raleigh, NC — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 02:30:33 GMT

Free speach must be able to include and even welcome perspectives outside of what others may see as correct, or comfortable; this also includes the delivery of the speach. Delivery in terms of tone, character, volume, and especially content. Personally, I view the actions of the police as crossing the line from peace officers to enforcers of eti-quite. I do not like what I saw in the least, either in the bahavior of the young man or the officers involved. Dude, you never fight the police - they win by definition. I have the greatest respect for police (all law enforcement) as they do an impossible job with passion and uncommon professionalsim in todays world. Perhaps that is why this bothers me as it does. I don't care in the least about the issues the young man raised, the fact that he was quited via force in my view looses grip with the constitution. The many laws which the police do a gret job of enforcing are balanced against the constitution - that balance is as vital as the law itself. Without the balance and its protections, the laws can not help from become repressive by our progressively more stringent interpretations of reality and consequence to fit the situations we find ourselvs in. OK there may not be a bright line, but I think to error in being overly protective of free speach would be able to tolerate a young man on a mission. I am only suggesting a somewhat more frequent reminder about the content and meaning of the constitution to everyone in our nation. I think this would be a good thing to assist us all in making decisions in uncomfortable stuations like these.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Bill Steed, Germantown, TN — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 02:36:50 GMT

I just want to say that I disagree with you about Clinton.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Nevada Democrat — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 02:50:55 GMT

Yeah, so what? Is it likely that a jack-a** like Kerry had anything worth interrupting?

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

T.E. Darby Poquoson, VA — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 02:52:46 GMT

Failure to obey a policeman acting in the line of duty is bad form

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

barnabas — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 03:01:39 GMT

Well, why should he say "I'm sorry?"

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Bonnie, Stafford, VA — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 03:03:31 GMT

I'll tell you what I don't see in these videos. I don't see Kerry being a leader. I don't see him stopping the police from taking away someone who was asking a question that might have been unpleasant for Kerry. I don't see Kerry even merely asking the police to simply escort the young man out of the building. I don't see Kerry leading.

I'm 42, well-respected in my community...... and observing. And I vote. I can't hear you Kerry...Do you have something to say?

Bonnie

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

C GEBHART — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 03:11:35 GMT

PUT A TASER GUN CAMERA ON ALL TASER WEAPONS AND THEN SEE WHAT WAS HAPPENING TO THE IN CUSTODY INDIVIDUAL,ANDREW MEYER.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Glenn Harvey, Marysville, WA — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 03:14:43 GMT

Meyer took more time than a questioner would be expected to take. He used the time to lecture more than ask a question. But, he did get three questions out and appeared to be near the end of his speech when he was arrested. Cutting off his mike and then pressuring him to listen to Kerry's answer would have been appropriate and likely successful. Even the speaker, Kerry seemed to be saying that Meyer was not so disruptive that he needed to be hauled away. Police overreacted by intervening. Meyer compounded that by resisting when they did intervene. A taser is a device that has caused serious or fatal injury in some cases. It should only be used when an officer would consider drawing his/her weapon.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

R. Brenton, Tucson. AZ — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 03:18:51 GMT

So much for the open minded, tolerant, peaceful party. If you don't agree with us we will taze you Bro.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

whatsitmatter? — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 03:20:39 GMT

Has Mr. Kerry responded or is he likely to respond to the questions posed by Mr. Meyers? He's not likely to be any more effective than Mr. Bush at being a true "representative" of the people of this nation. The police were doing their job, but Mr. Kerry might have been truer to himself if he had intervened on the young man's behalf. After all, he has certainly voiced his opinions, objections, criticisms and queries with much less consequence it might be noted...

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

J. — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 03:25:38 GMT

He apologized?
Pathetic!
Stand up for your rights or they will continue to take them away. Why didn't this student hire a lawyer? All these witnesses and he says he is sorry... for what? Using his freedom of speech in a forum? I can't believe this happened in this country, even if it was in the inbred state of Florida. First Jeb takes our vote away, now these so-called keepers of the peace take away our freedom of speech. Deplorable... all the officers involved make me sick.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

theo, boise, Idaho — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 03:32:27 GMT

I see nothing different in the other angles. Just the gestapo suppressing a citizen exercising his right to free speech.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

RBS, San Francisco, CA — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 03:37:54 GMT

I don't understand your point. You appear to see, what, three different incidents? Looks like one incident to me. This guy tried to ask Kerry legitimate questions -- and was overly excited, perhaps -- and was dragged down by police and electrocuted while the crowd cheered and laughed and finally one girl screamed.

Perhaps it has something to do with taking place in Florida.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

RBS, San Francisco — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 03:40:13 GMT

The question, again, is why was this guy dragged out police instead of Kerry answering his questions.

I don't blame him for his response. His First Amendment rights are being violated.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Janelle Allen, Birmingham, Alabama — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 03:41:23 GMT

Wrong, wrong just dead wrong. That was abuse if I ever saw any. Kerry should have stop that crap!!!! I watch all the videos and my opinion remained the same. I didn't see it anyway but WRONG!!! What in the hell is wrong with this country? The police were eronerated? Give me a break! Who bought their way out of that one? It just made me sick. I hope the young man never utters one apology.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Robert Doney Bayfield, CO — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 03:44:55 GMT

Hmmmm, kind of makes you wonder about our wonderful government doesn't it? Granted, the police officers had their orders to follow, my question is, what exactly were those orders? Our government obviously dictates WHAT is allowed to be aksked, WHEN it's allowed to be asked, and HOW it's allowed to be asked. This is exactly the kind of thing we used to see in communist countries. Whatever happened to a government BY the people, FOR the people. In all appearances, and reality, our government dictates everything we can do, including our guaranteed right to free speech found in our constitution. A constitution that is continuously misrepresented, and illegally used. President Bush and his cabinet are THE most embarassing, corrupt of any that I can remember. Nevermind the American people, let's just activate our own agenda's!

This young man, in ALL of the video sequences did NOTHING other than ask logical questions to Kerry, albeit, embarassing for Kerry.
This was an absolute travesty, and it VERY remeniscent of the Berlin Wall era.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Captain Wayne Genthner — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 03:47:58 GMT

Meyer asked an important question which aims at the heart of the political will of the democratic party to assume the responsibility of governing, even when their candidates for the top executive office in the nation clearly have reason and voter mandate to mount a substaintial challenge to election results. Another case in point is the meager challenge mounted by Gore's elect campaign in Florida. All of the votes in Florida should have been counted, not just those in certain precincts. This tactic was doomed to fail to the challenge by the elect bush campaign when the elect Bush legal team sought recourse through application of equal protection standards. This was the obvious move by the Bush team and any junior partner in a back water law firm would have anticipated it. Gore's legal team played a hand which they knew was too weak to win because Gore didn't want to lead the nation. Neither did kerry but both Kerry and Gore had no problem blamming Ralph Nader for their shortfalls in leadership. Thank the democratic party for another slide into facism because they sure do know how to grease the tracks.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Justin — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 03:50:18 GMT

It's hard to say.

On one hand, you have a college student aiming to bring attention to himself.

On the other hand, you have a college student aiming to prove a point that police are beginning to overreact more and more in today's world.

I don't see the point of tasing him with six police officers, two of which appear to be large males, on top of him. The officers are beyond rude to him, he is asking a question and wants a response. Are citizens not allowed to be informed of why they are being escorted away or arrested? How do you know you are being arrested until informed? Are you even resisting arrest until they specifically state, "You're under arrest"?

I wish the crowd would have intervened to stop this from happening. This is edging towards police brutality, which appears all too often anymore.

On top of that, you have John Kerry standing on the stage making the remark, "It's an important question, I just wish there was a more civilized approach." As if you're that great.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Gene Buffington — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 03:52:34 GMT

Most despicable thing I have seen all year. I remember when the police at UF were easy going, bright, professional level headed cops. Thats gone. They had no reason to tazer him and they had no reason to arrest him. That looked like some police state, not UF. What a disgrace.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

M.Crawford — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 03:53:04 GMT

What a crock. I guess your not allowed to ask a question at a "question and answer meeting" or you'll get tased for asking. The guy didnt pose a threat until the crap cops decided they didnt like what he asked. Im sorry but its not up to them. Typical cops abusing their power and i wasnt surprised that the department of law enforcemnt who investigated employees of the department of law enforcement found no wrong doing. Mr. Kerry himself was willing to answer the question if you listen and even tried to tell the B.W.B. (bullies with badges) to calm down and he would answer. So apparently they didnt respond because Mr. Kerry thought he was in danger, if Mr.Kerry thought he was in danger he wouldnt have said he'll answer the question. If you listen closely he said it was a really good question. But i guess now really good questions will get you tased. Probably right after they all split the latest drug bust money.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

chris hansen — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 03:57:26 GMT

UHM what?

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Jason H, Austin, TX — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 04:01:06 GMT

Of course he deserved it. He didn't ask a question expecting an answer, his "preface" and "three questions" were simply inflammatory. He was there only to be disruptive, not to engage in some dialogue. They tried to politely ask him to step away, then cut the mic, but he still persisted in being disruptive so they tried to escort him out and he CLEARLY resisted. The only way to control his exit was to handcuff him and even with 4 officers holding him on the ground, they had difficulty placing the cuffs, so they tasered him to get the cuffs on. He's lucky they were gracious enough to not use any other force.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Michelle, Wisconsin — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 04:04:35 GMT

I think that the police were totally out of line!
The student was simply asking a couple of questions, yeah maybe he got a little too loud about it but he didn't deserve to get arrested for it, let alone shocked with a taser gun. Kerry was answering his question, and he wanted to stay and listen. So why not let him?
I was struck by the fact that when he yelled for help, no one could help him. Who could help against the police, when they are the ones who are supposed to "protect and serve"? I think this incident is frightening in that respect, things could just get worse and worse (a snowball effect) and we, as citizens, will be left helpless.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Brad, Marshall Michigan — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 04:04:47 GMT

His actions were at the level of what is called resisting arrest, but without active aggression towards officers. The use of force model that is followed by practically every law enforcement agency in the US, is the one plus one model. In other words, one level of force above that being used by the arrestee. For his type of resistance, the force that is normally used is empty hand control(pain compliance with joint locks or pressure points), or soft intermediate weapon, i.e. pepper spray or taser. IN the crowded enviroment they were in, it would have been inappropriate for the officers to use pepper spray, and since empty hand control was not working, the taser was used. Unfortunately, people who know absolutely nothing about law enforcement, or their use of force training, were running around wringing their hands over this very minimal use of force.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Tom, Jonesboro, AR — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 04:13:36 GMT

Not only is this guy a fool, but he's a fool with a mental problem. He needs counselling, at the least.

None of these camera angles suggest brutality. If anything, they show that the officers were far more tame than they could have been given that he was resisting arrest. They should be given credit for their cool handling of the situation.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Moses, San Jose, CA — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 04:26:27 GMT

Clearly this guy was disturbing the peace. He was inciting something, maybe not necessarily a riot but he did respond in a very irresponsible and disrespectful manner. The police did their job correctly. They did not use unnecesary force and they were quite professional and patient, a little too patient if you ask me. This guy was being a jerk!

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Melanie W. Grand Haven, Michigan — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 04:38:16 GMT

They have yet to explain why campus police are even allowed to carry tasers. It is my understanding that most universities do not allow convicted felons to attend classes or live on campus. Tasers seem to be an excessive way to detain students in any situation.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Roger, Corpus Christi, TX — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 05:03:34 GMT

I see the same thing each time. Maybe he was obnoxious, but he wasn't doing anything wrong? I'm absolutely surprised by the lack of response from liberals at this suppression of speech. If this happened at a Bush speech, they'd be livid.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Richard H — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 05:07:14 GMT

Hey,
The guy set everyone up . . . and a lot of folks fell for it. I'm not a cop, but have a lot of good friends who are. I have spend many hours on patrol as a "ride along". So, with that said, when I saw this go down - I knew the guy was a dog from the start!

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

jon doe, seattle wa — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 05:12:00 GMT

i think the police shouldn't be tazing people for asking questions. exactly whom were they serving or protecting in the above scenario?

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

J. Moss, Clearwater, Florida — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 05:19:26 GMT

It didn't look or sound like the student was a threat to anyone. For a police officer to place their hands on anyone for simply failing to stop TALKING is abuse of power. Period.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Kevin Brant Olson — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 05:33:04 GMT

I watched all three angles and I think the tazer was unnecessary. I am a RN and I have had to deal with many violent individuals and I have never seen a tazer used yet the individuals were always subdued.

I question whether he should have been arrested in the first place "for inciting a riot" simply because his question was lengthy or because he asked three questions rather than one.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Don, Toms River, NJ — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 06:00:12 GMT

It's another case of someone in authority not liking what he was saying and s/he/they sent the officers in to shut him up. The officers were/are given too much "power", acting as if they can forcefully remove anyone who does not comply with the status quo.
The young man was not causing any harm prior to being forcefully removed. The officers and and the person(s) who instructed them to remove the student need to be charged with violation of Constitutional Rights and for almost inciting a riot (if they had not done anything at all, there would not have been an incident).
He did not comply with the orders of those in charge, but since he was not endagering anybody's life, they had no legal right to require him to be quit. It appears he fully intended to cause a commotion, but not one that would endanger life or limb, therefore he was acting within his Constitutional Rights.
The use of the taser was excessive force. There were at least 6 officers on him. If they could not "handle" him, then they need better physical training, or find another line of work. After he was handcuffed, to of the male officers had no trouble walking him around.
If the forum is not going to open to Fredom of Speech, then don't allow general public access. If those in charge want to censor the questions being asked, then hold a closed forum and select the people to ask the questions and give them the question to be asked. At the start of such a forum, make sure all those attending understand that it is being conducted as a dictatorship, not as a free society.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Dave — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 06:00:48 GMT

UM.. You were being escorted off of the property for not relinquishing the microphone after you began harrassing the guest speaker... Then you topped it off by throwing a temper tantrum when you were asked to leave.. That turned into resisting arrest when you wouldn't leave willingly, and continued to disobey and fight with the guys with who had badges.. That's what you did. I'm sorry that they tazed you bro, but you sorta acted like a 4 year old that couldn't get his way.. to the police. Not Smart.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Jason Call — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 06:07:06 GMT

What do I think? The police used excessive force. The guy said he would leave, at which point the police tackled him and tased him. I don't know what he is apologizing for, or why his charges were dropped conditional upon an apology. He asked Kerry a reasonable question, one which Kerry should have had the guts to answer. Mark Crispin Miller, professor at NYU and author of Fooled Again said that he talked to Kerry sometime after the election (theft) and that Kerry acknowledged to him that he knows the election in Ohio was manipulated. Of course, Kerry won't admit that in public, but I believe Miller (read Cruel and Unusual: Bush/Cheney's Nerw World Order by MCM) and think that the way Kerry rolled over in 2004 was pathetic. Ask John Edwards what he thinks about it.

Bottom line: Meyer asked a reasonable question in a public forum. Kerry not only shamefully dodged it, but proceeded to ignore the fact that police brutality was occuring before his very eyes. And the rest of the people in that forum - shame on you also. I hope Meyer decides to sue the UF police.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Joel Cooper, Westfield, IN — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 06:08:58 GMT

Mr. Sanders, I don't really understand what you mean about what the students saw compared to what we see in the videos, because you didn't say what you meant. Also, I don't see anything different among the three videos. I get a horrible feeling every time I watch any of them, because of the injustice committed by the police. It is scary, because although they are making individual decisions, it is kind of symbolic of what we all fear could someday be perpetuated at the highest levels of government. Obviously this guy is obnoxious, but he did not deserve to be censored, and he certainly did not deserve to be forcibly removed and tased. This guy should be apologized to at the very least, not the other way around.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

justin kinzer, hillsboro Oregon — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 06:11:07 GMT

Another person "apologizes" after having their civil liberties impeded.

He was probably threatened with a long term jail sentence, and he made a plea.

Please People stand up for yourselves, or this country isn't going to make it.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

justin kinzer, hillsboro oregon — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 06:12:01 GMT

Stand up for your rights.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

dc — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 06:15:42 GMT

Just curious, but does this kid have a history of mental illness? He is either not playing with a full deck, or he is really trying to get on television... either way, he looks and sounds pretty unbalanced.

You've got to feel sorry for the boys parents.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Jan Moss, Clearwater, Florida — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 06:25:26 GMT

Andrew, how does one get back constitutional rights that we still have a right to, yet are being denied, in practice, by this abuse of power that silences and frightens us more each day either by force or subterfuge?

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

F. Raymond — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 06:25:28 GMT

He needs to have a Psych evaluation. Then the University police needs to sue the hell out of him for all the false statements he made. He and his parents need to pay for years.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Heidi, Greenville, NC — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 06:36:51 GMT

They accused him of inciting a riot? Is that what asking questions during an open forum at a university, that might be uncomfortable for the speaker to answer, is now being called? From what I saw it appeared that even Kerry was trying to call off the officers who were being over zealous. The University of Florida Police should be ashamed of themselves, as should the institution itself who allows and condones this sort of behavior on their behalf. What we have learned here is that this institution which is supposed to be a haven for learning and questioning is neither of those from any angle.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

eugene c. — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 06:40:44 GMT

I saw several videos of the incident, from different angles, and they really don't change my conclusion much. Given that Kerry thought Mr. Meyers' question "important" and then proceeded to answer it was sufficient reason for police to back down. I think most people read too much into Mr. Meyers somewhat manic state. Like many young adults with immature public speaking skills, he rambled a bit in his excitement, but I have seen far less concise speech tolerated with much more dignity simply because it came from a senile little old lady or man.

It was quite clear from the videos he raised his arms as the police interfered with his questioning of Kerry, and his confusion and alarm is quite understandable. Given that I have seen plenty of politicians overrun their alloted time in more rigorously timed and refereed debates, and do so without police surrounding them as they went overtime, I would think the police clearly went overboard in addressing an issue better left to a single college-aged usher.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Frank Wagner, Phoenix AZ — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 06:53:16 GMT

It seems to me that the University Police did not handle the situation well. They could have made their intentions clear as to what was wrong and what would happen next. The student clearly was boisterous, and not cooperative with the police at the point that they are manhandling him from the microphone. If he was taz'ed at that point when he is down on the ground and five to six officers are there on the scene where not a punch was thrown or threat was made, that is excessive force in my book.
Asking questions in a public forum of this type is not inciting a riot. The speaker seemed to want to respond to the accusatory questions of the student. I am worried that the land of the free has become the home of the scared. Public dialog is a fundamental right that he was exercising in a less than polite way. So apology on the student’s part… accepted.
But like with the terrorist / patriot act we are made to fear standing up for what we believe. Maybe as a society we now accept water boarding, wire tapping, and rendition as acceptable practice in war time. Here at home are made to believe that anyone in a uniform has the right to use any force they see fit without explanation or repercussion. This is indeed a slippery slope.
So to the police and the investigation of them, in this incident which absolves the officers involved I believe an apology is due. That officers involved in this incident should be required to get more training in situation management, use of force, and charges of inciting a riot are so far from what was in the tapes that that officer needs to relearn the laws that deal with inappropriate conduct in public. Because we must demand from out police behavior that is not thuggish, or brutal but simply what is necessary to maintain the peace. This incident seems to have been avoidable if an officer would have been clear as to what was wrong and what would be done in a lawful way if our boisterous student would not relinquish the microphone well before it reached a physical intervention on their part.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Jim, San Diego, CA — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 06:54:59 GMT

He was making a speech instead of asking a question. Conspiracy point of view. Would not stop when asked. Began fighting with police when they tried to move him out of the auditorium. Clearly was paranoid--especially his comments about the police planning to kill him. Hysterically yelling seemed to be his way of getting attention and confirming the paranoia in his own mind. Tasing him was unfortunate, but he brought it on himself. The whole incident could have been avoided if his parents taught him manners.

If he wanted to make a speech, he should do it outside the auditorium were people could choose to listen--if they are interested in his point of view.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

TJ, Sacramento — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 06:55:56 GMT

Plain and simple the officers had no reason to arrest this man or lead him out of the forum. He was using his right of freedom of speech. Nothing in any of these videos shows Andrew Meyer doing anything wrong. Resisting arrest? Well, you can't arrest someone for using their rights.

Frankly, this is a perfect example of the government abusing their power. And the fact that hundreds of people stood by and did nothing is a testament of how much the American people have accepted the rape of our rights

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Jack Mickison — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 06:58:46 GMT

This is happening all over the US... peaceful protestors are being met with increasing violence. First its pepper spraying entire crowds of people and now its tazering. Pretty soon the government will just start blackbagging us from our homes in the middle of the night for speaking your mind againest what is going on in our country.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Aaron Altadonna — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 07:24:49 GMT

So this guy seemed out of line and uncivil, no arguing that. But he was given the opportunity to speak freely, Sen Kerry was allowing him to do so. The police decided what was and wasn't okay to say. It was apparent that he was simply distancing himself from the officers when they tried to illegally grab him without cause. He did not do anything illegal except look stupid. What's shocking is not a single officer in that group appeared to hesitate or consider the actrions they were taking. Also, can anyone let me know if the taser can legally be used for pacification? I thought it was just for defense, you know, like people committing assault? As in not laying on the ground simply shouting and distancing themselves from his attackers? We've all watched the guys on COPS take down a buffed out guy on PCP down. Why did this mob of police need the taser?

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Tom — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 07:27:16 GMT

THE MC HAMMER RE-MIX ON YOUTUBE WAS BY FAR THE FUNNIEST.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Doug, Seattle, WA. — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 07:30:39 GMT

My conclusion is.... this appeared to be censorship. There was, in my opinion, no inciting of a riot as the officers were heard saying. Kerry himself was heard in the background that he wanted to answer Meyers questions. Meyer, maybe, could have been more elegant in his approach but that shouldn't matter.

I think the officers were clearly in the wrong in detaining him in the first place. Then when he didn't comply with their wishes they tazed him. WRONG WRONG WRONG.

What did he do WRONG. The officers can answer that question for their actions. They di everything WRONG.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Charlie, Gainesville, FL — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 07:46:06 GMT

Remind me why I stood up and took an oath to defend this nation?

I am sick and tired of fighting for this God-Forsaken country. Let someone else do it for awhile...

A tired old Soldier

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Don, Dothan Al — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 08:42:30 GMT

This is why I love the internet. I never realized how much I didn't see on TV. I now know for sure that the tazed-kid is a clown.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Shirley Sedalnick, Lakewood, Co. — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 08:48:00 GMT

I think police in our country are to quick to tase or shoot. I know of two young black mentally-ill men who were killed for no good reason in recent years. One black woman was shot who was obviously psychotic. This was in Denver, not a terribly big city compared to some. This is a needless loss of human beings, who deserve better. Since when are hecklers tazed or shot. What happened to freedom of speech

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Kasey, Orange, California — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 09:16:08 GMT

Well when He is being taken away, Kerry was even trying to speak to the officers to have them stop. He said "Lemme answer his question" so he obviously didn't mind.

I think that they shoulda just let him finish.. Unless he kept rambling on and on. Then ask him to stop politely.. Not make a big scene

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Steve H., Seattle, WA — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 09:22:10 GMT

All the angles look the same to me...look like someone who isn't used to listening to anyone but himself.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

John Bencivnega Queens Ny — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 09:26:57 GMT

They should have gagged that wimpering little commie. He is proud to spew his anti-America non-sense while real men are dying to protect his liberty. They should have tased him until he shut up.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Ernest Aviles Fort Myers Florida — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 10:32:19 GMT

Law enforcement should NEVER get involved unless a speaker or manager of the set sees it appropriate to have an LEO get intervene.Debates do get crazy and do get loud but not to the point that police should taser someone .In this case I think the officers should have not taken upon themselves to ask the guy to sit or leave.That shold be up to the speaker to ask for the guy to stop.But also when LEO told the guy to stop and he didn't,he was at fault for not obeying LEO.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Mike Nelson — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 10:41:08 GMT

If the police would have left him alone, none of this would have happened. The campus police should be charged, but we know they won't be.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

John Doe, Seattle, Wash — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 10:51:50 GMT

Angle 1 depicts police brutality.
Angle 2 depicts police brutality.
Angle 3 depicts police brutality.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Susan — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 11:09:01 GMT

Just another symptom of what has gone so wrong in the mentality of this country. Before Bush arrived on the national scene with his mantra of fear, I attended public town meetings where at times people would speak passionately - no one ever thought of silencing them with police or tasers - oh, for the good old days common sense. Now we are not even allowed to address the local BOE with raised voices.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Chris Sharp — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 11:20:49 GMT

I was interested in this until you tagged your commercial onto the beginning of the video. Enough already!

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

K. Woodard Wichita, Ks — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 11:42:15 GMT

From a black man's point of view I have no comment.
To me it's just some white boy trying to garner attention! No harm No foul!!!

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Tom M., washington dc — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 12:06:31 GMT

This is another example of how cops use excessive force - the man wasn't swinging/fighting back - and he had a right to address the candidate. It's interesting how all the other people just stood around and watched like a bunch of cowards.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

David , Newark, Delaware — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 12:09:46 GMT

This fellow is an absolute idiot and the I wish the Police Tased him on his lips so that he would not be able to talk for a month. This is typical American college B.S. instead of teaching students tangible skills and how to be productive helpful members of society they teach protests, activism and other garbage like this. Oh.... by the way animal activists GOD put animals on the earth to be used by humans for food consumption and to be used for work and visual satisfaction.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

truamerican — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 12:17:59 GMT

We as americans should take it as an assault on our constutional rights to be draged away for asking a question, what he asked was only a clue to a much bigger picture, when all the pieces are put together it spells tax slaves, its all to do with the energy sector, nothind but the biggest fraud ever played out on the entire world,, do the research ,, Daniel Dingle, Stanley Miers, Denny Kline, Tom Volone, Yule Brown, Floyd Sweet and many many others,,, ask the RIGHT QUESTIONS,, dont be afraid to be tazed or killed,, its for the good of our future,, if theres one left now,,,

one who sees through the smoke an mirrors........

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

philip barker — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 12:18:05 GMT

I hear so many people complaining about rights being violated how many of you have ever served your country to protect these rights?.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

steve c., tallahassee, fl — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 12:18:45 GMT

When you get right down to it, who really needs a reason to tase a GATOR!?

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Wilfredo Silva, Bamberg, GE — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 12:30:16 GMT

When I saw these videos, for a moment I went back to my days in communism. I cannot believe this happened in my country; this is a shame for us that vow democracy to the four winds.

Section. 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
The First Amendment to the United States Constitution is a part of the United States Bill of Rights. It prohibits the federal legislature from making laws "respecting an establishment of religion" (the "Establishment Clause") or that prohibit free exercise of religion (the "Free Exercise Clause"), laws that infringe the freedom of speech, infringe the freedom of the press, limit the right to assemble peaceably, or limit the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Freedom of speech is the concept of being able to speak freely without censorship. It is often regarded as an integral concept in modern liberal democracies. The right to freedom of speech is guaranteed under international law through numerous human rights instruments, notably under Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, although implementation remains lacking in many countries. The synonymous term freedom of expression is sometimes preferred, since the right is not confined to verbal speech but is understood to protect any act of seeking, receiving and imparting information or ideas, regardless of the medium used.
I guess all of this are just words….

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

A, Grand Rapids, MI — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 12:36:36 GMT

I am all for open forums involving political figures. However, there was failure by all parties involved in this matter.

First, the event organizers should have timed or limited each question asking members of the audience to comply with this rule. Perhaps a class at major universities based on the Robert's Rules of Order should be mandatory?

Secondly, this kid should have prepared a more concise message versus the sophmoric rant he chose. He may have earned more respect from the moderators or police.

Lastly, five police officers could have thrown him out of the building and gaurded the doors to prevent him from coming in. He had no weapon on him, and was simply practicing free speech. At no time were people in the crowd brandishing pitchforks to rush the stage.

Serious flaws in decisions made by all parties involved.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Tiffany, Fort Wayne, IN — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 12:38:45 GMT

What happened to having respect for the police and authority at all. This is so typical of the young people in our society. Always have the last word, not listening to authority when asked to do something, and making everything a spectical when you don't get your way. This has nothing to do with free speach or police brutality, it is about a kid who doesn't know what to do when told no!

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Brian, Dayton, OH — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 12:42:09 GMT

He was looking for the attention. Most reports I have read said that once he was "off-camera" his behavior changed completely. This is what happens when you go out looking to get attention. Sometimes you get the wrong sort of attention. Did the police go overboard? Sure, by tasing this knucklehead. But this is less a free speech issue than it is a "I am going to see how far I can push this" issue.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Rai, USA — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 12:44:01 GMT

They may have been exonerated, but that does not mean that they did nothing wrong. I believe his human rights were violated. If an officer decides to detain me for doing nothing wrong, to create a position in which I feel unsafe for SPEAKING--when John Kerry, the speaker agreed to answer the questions. Why shouldn't I speak loudly and protest that act? Why shouldn't a person be allowed to ask a question, so long as it wasn't inappropriate or inappropriately framed? How does a question lead to an arrest and tasing?

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Jon Dough, Boondox — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 12:45:07 GMT

I find it rather foolish and arrogant for you nay-sayers to presume you know better then the FDLE in the field of law enforcement and the appropriate use of a retraining techniques....

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

John, Houston TX — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 12:49:02 GMT

Meyer is a spoiled college brat, looking for attention, to make a name for himself.

This is simple, break the rules and face punishment. He broke the forum rules, and he broke law, don't resist the police. You get tased bro.

Why do you criticize the police, should they be required to physically wrestle and subdue every idiot resisting arrest??? We pay them to protect us from idiots going on a rampage and killing people, what if Meyer pulled out a gun next on his little insanity spree?

Meyer, I'll tase you again bro.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Wade Roberts — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 12:54:52 GMT

The taser was designed and implemented as a less than lethal force tool for the safety and protection of law enforcement personnel and to prevent the need to resort to the use of firearms, enabling officers to safely disarm and disable an armed or clearly dangerous and resisting arrestee who represents a serious threat to the safety of those in the area or are in the process of making the arrest.
The presentation of the taser as a threat to intimidate and worse yet its use in this particular case is unethical and should be illegal, especially in light of the number of officers available and the low level of resistance offered. Had this victim instead been beat down with a nightstick, few would question whether or not the police used excessive force.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Matthew Schweitzer Columbus, OH — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 12:56:02 GMT

Every American has the right to free speech...so long as it does not infringe on the rights of others. Myers was clearly pulling a publicity stunt and he was dileberately disrupting the question and answer session with Kerry in hopes of provoking some kind of frenzy which would be captured on camera. He got his wish. This doesn't mean that I think it was right that the cops tasered him, which I also found to be excessive force, but he did clearly resist arrest and the police were doing their job. Myers however did get his wish and that is that everyone is talking about this incident, which is not a bad thing. As Americans we need to be aware of what goes on around us and what our government does. We need to ask the tough questions...but we also need to do so without trampling other peoples' right to speak too.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Ryan, Buffalo, NY — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 13:02:52 GMT

The scary part is that so many Americans actually believe that the right to "free speech" extends to everyone at all times in all places, no matter the content of their words or the context of the situation. The fact is, speech can be a form of aggression that imposes on others' freedoms.

Those assembled came to see what John Kerry had to say. That included his answers to questions determined to elicit a response from him. If some jackass wants to turn it into a Wendy's commercial about wanting more options than fries, its an act of aggression that robs both the speaker of the opportunity to share his view (which everyone has agreed to assemble to hear), and robs the audience of their chance to hear what they came for and ask further questions.

The show COPS is for those of you too ignorant to remember what you were taught in grade school: Law enforcement is not in place for your amusement, it is in place to protect and serve the people. When you act so selfishly as to trump all others' interests for the sake of your own, you don't get to then hide behind the civil liberties established for the good of all. When you are physically escorted away for disturbing the peace, you better bring more than a loud mouth if you plan on resisting. Bring that loud mouth to my door at 3AM unwanted, and I'll pop some popcorn while the police drag you away. The rights of the many to exist peacefully trump the rights of self-absorbed maniacs every time.

Read his confession, its all there. He's free to talk about what happened till the day he dies and share his opinion n the Today show and every other media outlet that will have him. This is what he said:

"I made the decision to supersede the rules, and for that I apologize," Meyer wrote. "I should have acted calmer and obeyed the directives of the officers. If I had, none of the subsequent issues would ever have arisen."

As far as Kerry goes, the same stale heartless lack of a stance on this idiot (he regretted a "healthy discussion" couldn't take place.... maybe he should point out were that responsibility lies?) cuts tot he heart of why he couldn't beat an idiot in a general election.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Jane Fawn, LA CA — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 13:03:28 GMT

No, you should ask Kucinich (grr how do you spell it again?) where the UFOs are. Upon first watching this and now rewatching it, seemed/seems a bit staged. From Kerry not getting involved and stopping it to the idiots cheering to the idiot yelling "dont taze me bro" ... just not sure what this was to condition us for. AGAINST or FOR tazering freedom of speech.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Beckwolf, Houston, TX — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 13:04:47 GMT

I absolutely would have tazed him in the same situation. He wasn't taken down for asking questions, he refused to step down after the allotted time was up and then resisted when they tried to get him to move. Was this any violation of free speech? Not a bit! He wasn't brought down for the questions, and that's been nothing short of obvious since the beginning. I've been tazed, willingly subjecting myself to it before I began to carry while running security duty days in the military, and we all subjected ourselves to it on a monthly basis afterwards (not as a reminder of the pain since it's quick and harmless, but to remind us of just how quick and harmless it really is, so that we'll remember that as soon the capacitor has released its charge, within half a second a person may up and resist again, which happens quite often. It brings instant pain, but then ends immediately after the tazing stops. He can clearly be seen crying in pain before he even gets hit, and then he continues to make noise afterwards, an obvious signal that he was faking it for the cameras. For those that don't understand the extremely short term effects of the taser, you still shouldn't be fooled, he did a poor acting job.
Any other situation, if it hadn't been a politician and the liberal media jumping on it so much, this kid would be facing charges. Politics is the only reason he's getting off, spoiled attention hungry uninformed jerks like him face charges for similar actions every day. He should could himself lucky that so many uninformed and quick to cry police abuse regardless of whether it exists or not made so much noise. Shame on the courts for not charging him as they would anyone else not facing this level of publicity, they let the media dictate law for them, and it's extremely disappointing.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Jeff, Philadelphia — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 13:06:20 GMT

You guys are right. I mean, he was ANNOYING. This is America. You don't have the right to "free speech" if it annoys people! And i totally agree that tazing pepole is always appropriate! Lets taze everyone who is annoying. In fact, if the police just shot him in the head the whole thing would have been over with so much quicker. That will teach those unpatriotic liberals who hate America to stop giving aid and comfort to terrorist. Those are American values right there. USA! USA! Republicans in 08!

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

bokchoi, chicago, IL — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 13:06:48 GMT

1. good point about police having to be tazered before checking out this WEAPON (it IS a weapon folks) to remember this is not a "toy"

2. good reminder on that FEMA fake "journalist" story

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Ken Taylor, Fort Worth, TX — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 13:12:12 GMT

I see a young man that was refusing to cooperate and follow the directions of the police. When the police indicated that they were going to force him to leave he should have turned around and left, not continued on with his aggressive rant. This is a civilized country not a third world country. Meyer got off lightly. This has nothing to do with a police state. Meyer got tased because he continued to struggle with the police even after they got him down. If he had stopped his rant then they would simply have arrested him, maybe not even that. The police have to do their job. Moral: don't fight the police, take it to court.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Gerry, Bayville, N.J. — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 13:13:22 GMT

This guy was a disorderly and disruptive fool. In stead of being a gentleman and asking a normal question and getting his answer, he chose to use the microphone as a platform for his own personal pitiful pulpit.

He is an unknown who desperately was seeking to be known by his rediculous diatribe and his subsequent babyish behavior when confronted by the officers. I would like to commend the campus officer's for their professionalism and for using the restraint that they that they did. They did a good job.

It's sad to know that while we have brave soldiers risking their live's in Iraq and Afganistan, and I'm sure that alot of them would rather be elsewhere, we have cowardly guy's like this acting in such a direspectful manner. God forbid if this guy ever got drafted, but then again after seeing him carrying on in a straight jacket he would most probably get an exemption for "medical" reasons that's if he reported at all before fleeing to Canada.

I think Senator Kerry's reaction was fine and appropriate from what I seen from the video on this episode.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

EyesGluedOpen, Orlando, FL — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 13:15:09 GMT

Do NOT leave out how this conditions others, mostly the young & next gen, to "applaud" and "standby" the police/government when a fellow citizen is having his rights ignored. He did not do anything to warrant that tazer. He was obnoxious to most, however, Kerry did NOT have a problem with that.

If this all was a ruse, from Kerry on stage to the tazering, then indeed I see this as a conditioning of having people not help ... not speak out ... not stand by his fellow man.

Government controlled citizens. Where has history shown us this before? anyone? I know you know. Some of you have been commenting on it.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Beckwolf, Houston, TX — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 13:18:17 GMT

"They kept interrupting him for apparently "taking too long" with his "question." Well, TOO BAD there, police... The guy is ENTITLED to USE HIS FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS and if it takes a little longer than some assinine "time limit" or if he isn't conforming to what YOU think he should be, that doesn't matter"

What!?!? Of course it matters, are you nuts? This has nothing to do with the right to free speech, he could have stood outside and talked about whatever he wanted to as long as he wanted to. This was a timed performance, all attendees informed that they were only allowed so much time to speak. During that time he was allowed to ask anything that he wanted. He wasted it with ridiculously uninformed questions like somehow thinking that Bush has committed impeachable offenses when everything was legal and approved by all parties, but that has nothing to do with what happened. What happened was he went past the allowed time, at a conference that was regulated and private, and then refused to move when asked and resisted all officers. I'd love to know what that has to do with free speech. People are looking for any excuse to cry that their rights are being violated, even when they're not, and the use of a taser is about the most humane course of action an officer can take. Quick pain and then gone, but gives them a chance to control the problem. Protects themselves, protects those around them, and protects the one they were arresting. Without that taser, police would be forced to forcefully control a person, potentially harming the person they're trying to control, or even getting hurt themselves. Why continue to allow officers to risk their safety and the safety of those around them. Tasers should ALWAYS be the first thing used, to protect everyone, including the one being arrested, and refusing to leave and resisting officers is one of the best reasons to warrant the use of that taser. In doing so, they protected everyone, and these videos show more than enough proof of that fact, even with his fake cries of pain BEFORE and AFTER being tasered.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

ed — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 13:21:15 GMT

"Tasers should only be deployed as a substitute for deadly force and when an officers safety is at hand"

So it rather obvious to me that these officers used excessive force, especially for someone who was just asking questions.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Beckwolf, Houston, TX — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 13:29:57 GMT

"It seems like the taser has become the torture device of choice, the easy option rather than the last resort."

So it would be better to save the safest form of subduing a person, using it as a last resort? Better to try and match strength against him and subdue him with arms and legs, putting themselves at risk, putting everyone else there potentially in the way and at risk, and putting him at risk as well? Save the object that causes pain for only a fraction of a second but causes no actual damage, in favor or what, hitting him to get him to cooperate? Break his bones? Or let him continue to swing and hurt people until he tires himself out?
Or just maybe, we should let them do the smart thing, and use the taser which doesn't actually damage anyone. Let them use the safest form of subduing a person, which if anything would be the least form of torture. Hmmm, being thrown around by a cop and pinned roughly, possibly getting injured in the process, or the cops themselves getting injured... or a short 1/4 of a second zap that leaves no lasting effects. Why is that even a question? Taser first thing, protect everyone. Darn right the taser has become the easy option. Easy option is BY FAR the best option, why choose the hard option and take unnecessary risks to everyone around? Your comment just makes no sense to me, I don't understand why the easiest, safest option should be used as a last resort, and the more dangerous options to everyone used first instead. God, this should be a no-brainer! No more torture, let the police use the taser first thing so that there won't be any need for physical torture to subdue a person. It protects everyone involved, if I was a criminal I'd hope that a cop would taser me versus trying to subdue me physically and possibly causing lasting damage

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Ken Taylor, Fort Worth, TX — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 13:31:55 GMT

For those who are complaining about free speech, this is not about free speech. This was a political event where people were allowed to ask questions by getting in line and using the microphone so everyone could hear the questions and participate. This kid decided to go on a personal rant and disrupt the event and THAT is what he did wrong, and then compounded it by fighting the police. Free speech does not give you the right to disrupt every political event. Still looks staged to me and political groups pull this kind of stunt all the time. Thats why the security was there.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Concerned Citizen 256 — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 13:34:39 GMT

Cops fired? Fed reg Title 18 sec 242 makes a violation of civil liberties under color of law a felony punishable by up to 1 year in jail. 18 usc 241 makes an officer who aids abetts or assists another to commit a 242 a crime punishable for up to 10 years in jail (victim's inability to turn to other officer for help deemed even worse). Fired? Well since most police forces have a policy against hiring felons that might be included as a consequence, no? Why no federal prosecutor or assistant US attorney in FL district not investigate, bring charges, etc... Did they? State attorney office also has laws at their disposal to press charges, investigate, and afford officers the full due process they deserve in considering their actions. Protecting the law means protecting the constitution too. It is also the law.
ConcernedCitizen256

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Ryan, Edmonton, Alberta — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 13:38:01 GMT

Despite the last question being moronic... the first two were valid. Why did he quit so fast? He must have been REALLY hungry for the job. Why not impeach Bush? Fire him like a grocery bagger who puts watermelon on top of eggs and bread!

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

John Doe, Atlanta, GA — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 13:38:22 GMT

He had an opportunity to ask a question. Not to be a disturbance. To allow him to take over the event with no end in sight to his questions/monologue would have been improper and against the purpose and time restraints of the event. Clearly, he wanted an "incident." The police gave him several opportunities to calmly walk away from the microphone and then to be escorted out to keep the event in control. His refusal to cooperate led the officers to take more agressive steps. He never cooperated with the officers, which would have quickly ended the situation. Meyer should be charged and prosecuted with the misdemeanor offenses of disorderly conduct and obstruction of officers(which fit his actions). Everyone else needs to act courteous when asking questions and reasonable when in contact with law enforcement.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Mike F. Frisco, Texas — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 13:40:54 GMT

Oh the poor child! The horrorhe brutality! Come on people. This was a set-up from the beginning.
Meyers brought the guy with the video camera because he was going to stage an "incident". The American public is so gullible. This guy should be locked up as a public nusiance.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

John Burton, Louisville, KY — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 13:41:56 GMT

I don't think he was Tassed. The videos show no evidence of it. Other than him shouting don't taz me bro.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Cindy Ne wJersey — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 13:43:28 GMT

Those of you who are complaining that his right of Freedom of Speech was violated should really take a close look at the constitution and the law in general. Your right to freedom of speech does not supecede the law at all times. Meyer clearly disregarded what was said to him by those running the gathering. Yes, they may have been trying to limit what he had to say, but that wasn't truly violating his right to freedom of speech. Read the entire Bill of Rights. It is more than just a list of freedoms. Meyer also reacted violently toward the police. He clearly resisted when they were trying to remove him which was just plan stupid. If he spent as much time clearly thinking how to get his questions out there, rather than planning these stunts, he might achieve a lot more.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Brett, Erie — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 13:46:12 GMT

Has anyone here been tasered? My dad is a state cop, and just for show I asked him to taser me yesterday, to tell you the truth the 500,000V that was passed through me didn’t hurt, it just stunned. (Hence stun gun?)

Lets pose the more obvious question:

If someone was resisting arrest (these videos obviously show it) for any reason. Would you want him:

a)shot (9mm and 45 ACP, that will do more than stun)
b)Night Sticked (I can hear the ACLU now)
c)Non lethal tasering

The problem with the system is the youth of today (I am one im 22) feel that their should be no repercussions for their incursions on any level. No matter what the question he was going to ask Mr. Kerry he should of acted civil (like any US citizen should) and asked it in a polite way. If John would not have answered then that in itself is an answer. This was a stunt. Resisting arrest in any form is illegal, and if the police officers were showing bias he should of quietly and the audience would have seen that bias. Now he just makes himself look like a fool.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Jim — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 13:50:22 GMT

He was not a danger to anyone, and the officers had him under control. The fact that the officers should not have arrested him in the first place is fairly obvious. The fact that he was tasered should result in charges for the officers involved, retraining for their entire department, and a public apology from the police chief. This type of a police state is intolerable. America, the land of the free, what a joke.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

San Ramon, CA — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 13:51:29 GMT

Angle 1 depicts police fulfilling their required duty.
Angle 2 depicts police fulfilling their required duty.
Angle 3 depicts police fulfilling their required duty.

Angle 1 depicts Meyer committing a crime warranting the use of a taser to protect everyone in the situation.
Angle 2 depicts Meyer committing a crime warranting the use of a taser to protect everyone in the situation.
Angle 3 depicts Meyer committing a crime warranting the use of a taser to protect everyone in the situation.

Taser: a perfect solution against torture. They have a very short term shock and no lasting damage, making it the first thing that police should always use to subdue a suspect. Big disappointment here, Meyer is let go even though he committed a crime, let go only because of politics of the uninformed and those quick to cry wolf.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

San Ramon, CA — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 13:57:43 GMT

"1. good point about police having to be tazered before checking out this WEAPON (it IS a weapon folks) to remember this is not a "toy""

In most places, they are tasered before checking out the weapon. We were monthly at my Navy base, and my family members who are police officers have all been tasered as well as every other officer I know. It's actively encouraged and in many, many locales, a requirement. A necessity for, if no other reason, to remind them just how the effects of the taze wear off quickly, and in many instances the suspect will within a second or two of being shocked jump right back into attacking if the officer isn't quick to react after using his defensive weapon.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Larry Pierce, Richmond, VA — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 13:59:06 GMT

Drag the guy outside, THEN tase him.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

howlinbill — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 14:01:20 GMT

what the heck is wrong with everyone? ..a person voiced his opinon and was attacked for it...what has happened to our rights as americans in the last seven years? did we vote them away or what?
STAND UP AND MAKE CHANGE HAPPEN!!!!!!!!!!!

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Ryan T-bury ma. — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 14:04:02 GMT

What happened to our country? Its sad that we have so many stupid people here now. The people that hate the police...well they are losers that have had problems with cops before. This was a prank! The kid that got the tazer wanted it! I just wish all the john kerry tree huggers would move to canada! That is a country for you! STUPID PEOPLE THINK WE ARE BEING OPRESSED. Get a clue!

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Aaron Celestin, Fort Walton Beach, Florida — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 14:05:17 GMT

Many comments here are dismissive of Meyer and his intentions, saying that he was looking for attention and he got it. Those of you who are cynical and dismissive of actions like these need to see the larger picture. It doesn't matter if Meyers was attention-whoring or "selling toilet paper or any other kinds of crap", he could literally be a manure salesman by day, but it makes absolutely no difference at all. He asked a few wild questions, Kerry should have dealt with it the way speakers do in forums like these, by not answering them.

How do the people of this great country become so cynical towards their fellow individual citizens but totally, completely and blindly trust the government that is also made up of individuals? Are all government officials and employees beyond reproach? If not, then where is your cynicism towards them? Why do you have such an irrational, illogical trust and respect for the government, but not its citizens, when you know that it's made of imperfect people too? I really don't get it.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Jean Hurley — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 14:08:02 GMT

the police did no wrong, the guy is an attention getter and deserved what he got. He should learn to be a gentleman. His parents are wrong to defen his actions. Guilty on all accounts.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Peter, Burlington MA — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 14:08:24 GMT

I love reading all these comments. The freedom of speech is really cool.
The problem I see, is that people drop the "Free speech" line ANY time someone is detained/arrested/questioned, etc.
If I got the story correct, the question and answer session was OVER, and Andrew Meyer forced his way to the microphone basically demanding to get a question. It is perfectly legal and acceptable for someone that is holding the meeting to set time limits and end questioning. If they had decided to cut him off JUST because of what he was asking, then I would start screaming "Freedom of Speech" too. But it doesn't appear to have happened that way..it was stated that the person in front of him was the last one.
So.. it appears to me that he was being disruptive to the meeting and was asked to leave, but he wouldn't so they went over to escort him, and he still wouldn't go...then he started acting like an...well...yelling and screaming and fighting.
When they had him on the ground, it appears that he is still struggling. Yes, there were many officers holding him, BUT, he was still struggling. How long do they sit there holding him before they need to use more force? What's the limit? Is it preventing the meeting from continuing?
I think the police did what they did to end the struggle...period. I know a few police officers and from what I've learned from them, none of them ever really want to use too much force (I know there are those who disagree with that too, but I also acknowledge that there ARE execptions to that statement..they aren't all angels...)
Freedom of speech protects you from the government punishing you for your opinions and thoughts, but it doesn't protect you from acting like a fool and disrupting meetings...he COULD have just left when he was asked.
Maybe I'm wrong, but that's my opinion

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Jim " K " Parsippany,NJ — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 14:08:59 GMT

The way I see it from all three angels is that the female police officer started the whole thing .He just started talking when she tried to censor him. Then she ran for help. And another thing I know for sure is that some police get off on taking out there agression on people that they know can't do to much harm to them .
And you can also see that woman's on a power trip.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Claye Stokes, Orem, Utah — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 14:10:41 GMT

Idiot prankster or not, is there anything in our Constitution that would deny him free speech?

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

IKE TAYLOR — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 14:14:58 GMT

THERE SURE ARE A LOT OF PEOPLE POSTING THINGS ABOUT THE COPS INSTEAD OF WHO CAUSED THEM TO REACT. IF YOU LOOK AT MOST OF WHO POSTED AGAINST THE COPS YOU WILL QUICKLY LEARN OF THEIR LACK OF INTELLIGENCE. MOST OF THEM CANNOT EVEN SPELL!

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Brian H — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 14:16:25 GMT

Remember, the government must silence your questions for your own protection. You don't know what's best for you so the government must protect you from yourself.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Mike, Melbourne, Florida — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 14:19:29 GMT

People get a clue! I see hugh numbers of cops having surgery and then physical therapy after fighting with suspects. If I had a TASER and you wanted to keep resisting... you're getting TASER'd!

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

John Calhoun Houston Tx — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 14:22:57 GMT

For those who are name calling the young man, I will say what ever is your affiliation or political persuasion aside. My question is if you cannot express yourself in United States of America where can you? Now the taser part was really frightening, yes granted he may have resisted to be escorted out, but for God Sake what had happened here was an excessive use of force.

As an American who does not have any vested interest one way or another, I feel compelled to point out, that the most advance country on earth cannot standby and watch an unarmed American citizen teased like a common criminal.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Andrew R Miami, Florida — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 14:27:29 GMT

The case is clear; We have become Cuba, or Mynamar.
You ask a civil question and the goverment beats you down. I would sue and take this all the way to the Supreme Court. So what is the penalty of assault, battery, as well as violating your constitutional rights?

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

John Esh — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 14:29:04 GMT

Question time used to be for questions not unprovoked assault on peaceful civilians

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

George Mahieu, Charlotte NC — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 14:30:08 GMT

This person although a moron still had the right to speak, or has the constitution been changed, and Kerry ok'd the question. The police had no right to do as they did, hustle him offstage is one thing but tackle him, cuff him THEN fricken Tase him, why, what did it accomplish, and that female cop not wanting the camera's seeing it, seems to me 1 cop knew they were wrong and didn't want a taped copy as proof. It's gotten to the point that the cops think they can do as they please, and these were just campus cops. whats next, take down, cuffs and arrest for thinking?

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

The Voice of Common Snse — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 14:32:26 GMT

There is nothing wrong with speaking your mind. however, it must be balanced against the general welfare and good of all. While it may appear to some as if this young man is being deprived of his right to express his concerns with actions taken by Senator Kerry, he is using the wrong forum to express those concerns, and doing it in a confrontational and inappropriate way. I don't think this qualifies as an indication of a police state. I think it shows how one person can disrupt the rights of others while thinking his rights are more important than those who cam eto hear Senator Kerry speak. Tasering? One part of me says it was allowable due to the fact that he wasn't complying with the law officers orders. The other part says it was done to make him shut up and stop whining.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

John James Nashville TN — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 14:32:29 GMT

IF Kerry really wasnt afraid of the questions, he could have just answered them, stoped the tasing and let the kid go on his way. And he's supposed to be a free speach guy ????

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Javier Davila — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 14:34:58 GMT

Introducing a line of questioning that is also making a point is not and it should not be illegal. Yes he was leading Kerry down a path that was not of his choosing, but why do we have to answer to politicians all the time? They should still be answering to us! Let's examine the word obnoxious that has been used repeatedly when describing how this fellow acted. He did not stay in line with the scripted q&a session that has so many Americans duped these days. The rhetoric is fine as long as it's the rhetoric that they want you to hear? No. This and all rhetoric needs to be hanging out there in space so that people have the right to choose how they want to think, not be directed on what to think. The point he was trying to prove about Kerry's character is old news. But the fact is that Americans in general have a very short attention span. We also have a tendency to forget sources and assume that everything we hear and read is just fact. Don't forget how to think people. And if you never learned how to think, do it! And if you don't like what I say please... don't tase me bro!

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Mark — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 14:35:53 GMT

If the student was black there would be protests all over the US and the rent a cops would have been fired.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Ruth, Perryville, MD — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 14:38:03 GMT

Seems like very few people really get it. This gentleman refused the lawful order of a police officer. Mr. Meyer can have all the free speech he wants, provided it is within the guidelines previously set up. When you fail to follow the rules, there are consequences to pay, whether it's a ticket, a fine, or getting Tasered, bro. Simple remedy for this type of thing? Follow the rules!

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Art Vandelay, NYC — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 14:38:49 GMT

Cops hate cameras because people like you dont know what you are looking at. You see a piece or caption of a story and then you make your own conclusions as if you were there from start to finish. Then make comments on blogs. The guy was LAWFULLY asked to leave he refused the LAWFULL order. He resisted and rather then punch, kick and force him to get handcuffed a quick jolt of the taser gets him under control. The situation is resolved rather quickly after the taser is deployed. If you dont like the law go to you reps and have it changed. People have a right to allow someone to speak. Those hosting John Kerry have a right to ask someone to leave. bottom line

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Jarlath Bloom, Fort Lauderdale, Fl. — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 14:40:13 GMT

In this day and age, if someone doesn't comply INSTANTLY with a Police Officer, I would have no problems walking over and tazing them myself. Then i'd kick them in the head for being so stupid.

The Police are there to protect the people. Don't resist arrest, don't fight them, don't argue with them. Comply and the situation will be resolved with as little force as possible. Don't comply, and I have no qualms if they taze or pistol whip you for causing a situation in a room full of hundreds of people.

Sorry but the greater needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

gene richmond, va. — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 14:42:58 GMT

He has a history of staging things like this. The Police used reasonable force to subdue him. Guess what right or wrong cooperate do what you are told don't resist and you will treated civily.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Noel, Washington DC — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 14:43:07 GMT

I think the Police acted correctly. Free speech is far different from being allowed to say what you want in a private event, even if it is open to the public. Those hosting this meeting had the right to not only cut him off, but have him escorted outside. Those that say his freedom of speech was violated, obviously have no clue as to what freedom of speech means. It does not mean you can say whatever you want, wherever you want to. He reacted violently to the police, and therefor got what he deserved. The police deserved to be found vindicated.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Greg B, Virginia MN — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 14:44:15 GMT

I would be interested in knowning exactly who gave the order to cut Meyer's mic and remove him. Some accounts say that his mic was cut for saying b***job, but that wasn't at all the case. It wasn't until he got to the "Skull and bones" question that he was shut down. It looked as if Kerry was telling the police to back off of him, and would have answered the questions. I would be interested in knowing the answers to Meyer's questions, as I'm sure many Americans would. By the same token, I've looked at this video now for a few days, from multiple angles. The police had him subdued, and as near as I can tell, tased him *AFTER* he was in handcuffs.

While I agree that Meyer was attempting to resist arrest, and he was out of control, he was back under control BEFORE he was tased. The part that confuses me (since I have seen the video outside of the room as well), his reason for arrest was "Inciting a riot". Meyer, as he stated, had been "listening to Kerry for 2 hours". He was cut off at the 30 second mark, when a good 15-20 seconds of that time was spent THANKING Kerry for coming and speaking.

I don't think the crowd was applauding Meyer's removal and arrest, I think they were supporting him for taking a stand. (At least that is the way that I perceived it).

I don't think that Meyer was necessarily "showboating" or looking for his 15 seconds. I think that, as most people, he had his opportunity to ask questions that had been burning in his mind, was excited about actually getting to ask them (adrenalin rushing, etc.), and then got frustrated when he was shut down, and even more frustrated when he was removed by force. I'm sure that at that moment that he was feeling slighted; that his rights were being trampled, and that in combination with the excitement of finally being able to ask his questions made for a mistake on his part.

The police, however, had more than enough manpower to escort him OUT and away from the audiance, instead of dropping him right there. The police are lucky that they *didn't* have a riot on their hands; that they weren't rushed by the other students. Kerry could have asked Meyer to calm down and answered his questions; but it never got to that point. Instead, someone pulled the plug on Meyer's mic (on who's authority???) and probably that same person signalled the police to remove Meyer.

Bottom line: Was Meyer in the wrong? For resisting arrest, yes. He could have made a statement like "This is how you're answering me?" and walked out calmly. But, adrenelin mixed with fear and he wasn't thinking very well.

Were the police in the wrong? Yes and No. I don't fault the police for removing Meyer; I have no doubt that it wasn't *their* decision to do so, someone signalled them to. However, they were in the wrong for not removing Meyer completely out of the area, removing him from his audiance, and de-escalating him outside of the view of others. They were dead wrong in tasing him, especially in front of the other students.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

John Doe II , Nowhere TX — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 14:44:49 GMT

I think most of you are right he is a moron, but too has the right to speak his mind.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Beckwolf, Houston, TX — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 14:45:15 GMT

"Has anyone here been tasered? My dad is a state cop, and just for show I asked him to taser me yesterday, to tell you the truth the 500,000V that was passed through me didn’t hurt, it just stunned. (Hence stun gun?)"

Yeah, once a month for a couple of years. It hurt a bit, but it's the only pain I've ever experienced that disappeared entirely almost immediately. Mostly it causes a jolt, but there wasn't a lot of pain. Like a quick pinch, but no soreness afterwards. We used it during our monthly session on one guy who had exercised the day before and was still really sore. The tension it caused in his muscles made them hurt a bit more for a couple of minutes, like pressing weights to failure, making your arms hurt, and then the soreness of trying to get in one more set.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Mike IsBell — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 14:46:34 GMT

What amazes me is that so many who view this event see nothing wrong with the Gestapo tactics of the university security. God saves us from what we are fast becoming.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Drew, Montreal, Quebec — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 14:47:29 GMT

Look at this guy on top ...your a idiot for calling someone a idiot for expressing a opinion... 10$ says he had a button and pressed it to get the police to intervene because he was put on the spot hehe.Well what ever the world itself is all screwed up a little ..everyone trying to be better then one another and such, so there no real point of even talking about these types of things anymore. With all this animosity its impossible to live peacefully, unless your pulling the wool over your eyes. Hey anyways gotta love freedom of speech, happy your still allowed to speak your mind in public..riiiight.

p.s How did they implement spelling into a forum/blog thread post box ?!?!?!? Thats neat.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Matt — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 14:48:10 GMT

If all he did was ask questions this would be a tragedy. But it is clear he did more than ask questions and when asked to comply he resisted.

Clearly if he had merely followed the rules of the forum his questions would have been answered. If he had not caused a scene upon being cut off from the mic for breaking the rules of the forum, he may have had his questions answered. If he had left when guided out by the officer. He would not have been handcuffed. If he had not resisted being handcuffed, he would not be tased.

He is clearly at fault and should be tried in a court of law. The officers should be reprimanded for not removing him from the room quickly enough.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Anon — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 14:48:36 GMT

He probably only got tased because the police were severely deficient in lulz.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Mr. Hunter — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 14:51:11 GMT

Andrew Meyer is an attention seeking moron who doesn't play by the rules and doesn't deserve the attention he is getting.
The police behaved quite appropriately. He wasn't tastered enough.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Ray Porter — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 14:53:42 GMT

Andrew Meyer was obnoxious and inflamatory in his remarks and demeanor. So what! So were Patrick Henry and Thomas Jefferson and George Washington in their day, and fortunately they had a forum to voice their opinions, without fear of police retaliation. In 230 years, we've gone from a society attempting to establish a new democracy, based upon personal freedom of expression, to a society retreating into brutal totalitarian police repression.
What has happened to the United States in the past six years is sickening to anyone with any sense of history or patriotism. Many of us have become the mindless robots of "1984," following the "newspeak" of the current administration, which has twisted the meaning of the words "freedom" and "liberty" and "democracy" to mean "repression" and "incarceration" and "endless warfare."
We continually hear about the "War on Terror," as if "Terror" was a definable enemy. We are at war with Islamofacism, which should be fought using Special Forces and undercover black ops - not through the expensive, full-scale military-industrial machine, which is depleting our treasure, disrupting our government, and dividing our people.
Meyer's little temper-tantrum just exposed what we should all admit is happening - we are not the USA anymore!

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Bubba Gump Tacoma, WA — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 14:54:57 GMT

I think this is a simple matter of stupidity on both sides. Remember it takes two to tango. The police probably shouldn't have tried to arrest him in the first place, they could have just dragged him out. As a former candidate for the presidency, Kerry is under alot of protection, so things like outbursts and anger are going to be treated differently. He shouldn't have used that forum to make a personal statement. Well, they both looked stupid in my opinion. If he can't be charged with anything, I don't see how the cops could either.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

speak truth to power — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 14:56:08 GMT

I think the most important thing for people on this forum to think about is freedom itself. Does anyone on here really believe that the media tells us what we need to know in a democracy??? The first casualty when war breaks out is TRUTH. Where was our media? Andrew Meyer was asking a question about the elections that MIGHT have kept us out of this latest quagmire. A different president MIGHT not have declared war on a nation that NEVER threatened us.it's about the media. look up the meaning of "fascism". Pay special attention to Mussolini's description. then think about this......
"The illusion of freedom will continue as long as it's profitable to continue the illusion. At the point where the illusion becomes too expensive to maintain, they will just take down the scenery, pull back the curtains, and you will see the brick wall at the back of the theater." Frank Zappa

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Mike, Omaha NE — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 14:58:02 GMT

If you think that was bad...try asking Hillary a tough question...nothing short of cement shoes and a permanent spot at the bottom of the arkansas river.
Don't P-O a liberal with power.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

John Walker, Toledo Ohio — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 14:59:25 GMT

I think the guy was being a jerk but he in no way made a move towards Kerry. I think he was within his rights to ask questions. He did not conduct himself properly but that is neither here nor there. The police made a move on him when he was clearly leaving. If they thought he might change directions and head towards Kerry they should have blocked access to him. Grabbing the guy was not appropriate. Just because his view(s) aren't the same as yours doesn't make them invalid or even offensive. Freedom of speach has its limits but taking a liberal to task is not one of them. I have to say I was a little comfused by his remarks though. It appeared to question if Kerry was liberal enough or truly a liberal ... funny considering Kerry is much more of a socialist than a Democrat.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Sam, Houston, Texas — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 14:59:49 GMT

I think the officers over-reacted and there was no need for them to taser him. If nothing happened to these officers, then that is a miscarriage of justice. Did the student actually end up charged with Inciting a Riot or was the arrest simply to stop his questions? Free speech was definitely not protected in this instance.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Lyn McKay, Rapid City, SD — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 14:59:53 GMT

Fake or no, the guy was simply asking some questions. This is America after all, we are (currently) still allowed to ask questions of our elected officials. And to those of you in the military who mocked him, SHAME ON YOU! These are the rights you are supposedly defending! Just as John Kerry FOUGHT for his right to criticize his government.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Joe Las Vegas,NV — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:00:03 GMT

We have become an abusive police state.Period!

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Guy L. — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:00:15 GMT

Yes i have seen all three videos and saw no reasons for this young man to have gone through all that. That was cruel and yes these police oficers used too much force and Kerry another Coward did not stop them from mistreating this kid. His trouble really came at the last question, when he asked about the occult society that most presidents belong to, the skull and Bones or (Bonesman) out of Yale University the bushes belong to that group, The Rhodes Scolars Clinton belongeg to that one etc... do some research people.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Mike Omaha, NE — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:02:20 GMT

To say this has ANYTHING to do with BUSH is a continued grasp at straws by LIBERALS who have no ideas, no plans and nothing but a scapegoat mentality.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

BUBBA GUMP TACOMA, WA — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:02:43 GMT

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Don, Columbus, Ohio — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:07:04 GMT

Typical BS you would expect from anything related to John Kerry. As for the cops...that is what happens when you put people who aren't smart enough to go to college in that position. Every one of those cops are jealous and envious of all students....and took great pleasure in hurting that kid. People who earn college degrees do not become cops.....they get jobs that count.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Cop's Wife, Charleston, SC — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:08:19 GMT

First, all of you cop haters, hope you never need one. Secondly, in response to the person who wrote all cops should be tased every morning, my husband is a cop, he had to be tased in order to carry, just as they have to be sprayed with pepper spray to carry that too. My husband risks his life every day in order to help others, but as usual those of you who don't lay awake at night wondering if your spouse will make it home again, are always so ready to critcize. They have a split second to make a decision. They don't know these people. Don't criticize until you have walked in their shoes.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Randy Miller, Austin, TX — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:10:57 GMT

The only thing I wish would have happened was a few knees to the groin. This guy is an idiot and if he wants to start a melee in that setting, he deserves everything he got and he's lucky it wasn't worst. I love watching idiots get taken down and/or tasered. Comply with the request of authority and you'll be fine. Act like an idiot, and you should get tasered, at a minimum.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Jeff, Canada — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:11:01 GMT

I can't believe what a bunch of bleeding heart crap I'm reading on this page. Police brutality? This from the same type of people who whine and snivel about every little thing in their pathetic lives. This isn't about free speech as much as it's about some idiotic child who doesn't have enough common sense to listen to what the police are telling him to do. Everyone wants to be free to do exactly what they please, when they please, with no responsibility or acceptance of their actions. That seems to be the prevailing attitude of many Americans and it shows. This is a kid with too big an opinion of himself and what he thinks who ended up - rightfully so - on the wrong end of a taser. The police should've tased his disobediant butt sooner, when he continued to resist. I certainly would've. And all his rambling about the book "Armed Madhouse" is just that - rambling. The Nazi's would've loved this kid.

And now it's become more than what it really is: some idiot kid who got tased for getting out of line. No big deal. The police were well within their rights to do so. Stop whining America, and see this for what it is; you've too long acted like an over-indulged child and your character as a country, as a people, has suffered because of it. Stop sensationalizing everything and get back to basics: respect, discipline, principles and values. Or do you need a dictionary to look up these words?

Only in America.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Russ Korte, Plymouth, IA — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:15:52 GMT

Cops have proven themselve's pigs time after time.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

JS, Englewood, CO — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:17:11 GMT

Sure he's annoying. Let's round up all the annoying people, handcuff and electrocute them!

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Jake, NJ — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:17:22 GMT

If he were there to simply get responses to his questions he would have asked them in a calm manor, respectful to the forum to which he was speaking. He started shouting while asking the questions, said the word "blowjob", and asked a question irrelevant to his previous 2 or 3. He was trying to get a rise out of the audience and the general public, which he was very successful at doing. This is not police brutality. Meyer's questions, speech, tone, and actions were getting more and more irate, and once officers tried to escort him out to alleviate the tension and the scene he started forcefully hitting and pushing the officers. He did not comply. They warned him, and gave him the option to stop resisting arrest and he made the decision to continue. The point is, at every point of this video the Meyer had the choice, and his decisions led to his arrest and subsequent tasing. It’s a shame too; it would have been nice to hear Kerry’s responses.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Chris, Austin, TX — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:20:50 GMT

I think the police did a great job. He was disorderly, and deserved what he got. I think its a shame they didn't press charges on him. Just another example of a meaningless story wasting our time.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Patrick Buckles, Phoenix, AZ — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:20:53 GMT

He got what was necessary, for using the term "bro".
Stop whining 'bro'!

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Laura, Tallahassee — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:21:15 GMT

Yes, the kid had a right to ask a question. But he kept asking question after question. The objective of the seminar/forum was to have multiple people ask questions, not one person. He was prepared for this to happen. Before everything started he asked someone to hold a camera on him and keep taping. He was yelling at the students trying to rile them up. His purpose was to cause a scene and get attention. He succeeded. I thought at first the police should have just drug him completely out of the room, that then he would have shut up since he would have lost his audience. However, without cameras present he would have been able to lie and say something happened that didn't, and would have likely sought a lawsuit as well as all of this attention.

(This isn't his first attention-getting scheme. After the Harry Potter book was out he stood on a street corner wearing a sign that said "Harry Dies." Freedom of speech? No...just a grab at attention with the sole purpose of upsetting somebody.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Steven, Bethesda, MD — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:21:27 GMT

Too bad they didn't use a real gun. He knew exactly what he was doing. People like this don't deserve any fame. I hope this loser can never get a real job now that his name is plastered all over the internet.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Anthony Sinclair — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:26:06 GMT

Can anyone answer his questions?

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Karla, Florida — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:26:40 GMT

He did not have to send an apology letter to nobody. The cops got their job back after being suspended w/ pay. Hurting a student who was not a threat to nobody, he was just asking questions. They cut the microphone because they did not like the type of questions he was asking. They only like the cookie cutter questions that will not make anybody sweat answering them. I believe the student should be apologized for violation of the 1st ammendment, the kid had no weapon on him, therefore he was no threat. Perhaps that is why kids are bringing guns to school now because they don't trust the authority who violates their rights?

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Bubba, New York, New York — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:28:51 GMT

i can't believe anyone on here would defend the police. this is clearly a fee speech violation and another example of how this country is becoming communistic/police state. he didn't ask the right questions, so he gets tazered. even if the police had the right to arrest him, what would give them the right to tazer him? that is ridiculous. that's just like Bush and Clinton and all these other crooked politicians, being selective of who they let in when they speak. it's totally biased. you could see Bush on t.v. and everyone's applauding, but only because everyone was prescreened. if you look like a liberal/democrat/etc... they don't let you in and the media doesn't cover those barred. our media is biased, our police are biased, and our politicians have way too much power. what ever happended with Power To The People. are the rich/elite the only one's that matter anymore, which is like less then 2% of the population?

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Matt, Ohio — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:29:22 GMT

It was an overreaction on both parts. The guy was being hyperdramatic. However, they were restraining him fine with what? 4-5 people? using a taser seemed completely unneccesary from ANY angle, unless I missed a part where he tried to swing a bunch

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Timothy P. E — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:29:50 GMT

Yo Bro,
He shocome to Iraq

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Stolen Freedom--Denver — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:30:14 GMT

They obviously used excessive brutality. They had it under control. They thought oooo lets show out power for picking on the little white boy. The government has too much power. After all, the kid was just asking a question. What is the harm in that? funny thing is, Kerry continued to answer the question as the student was being taken down and tased. My point, they had no reason to do any of it.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Grant Oklahoma City — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:30:21 GMT

How can anyone say that someone speaking is combative. Even yelling at the top of your lungs is not combative. Unruly maybe, but not combative. Free speech does not mean you can scream fire in a movie, however it does mean you can scream.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

John D. Largey — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:31:00 GMT

You all must realize we live in a totalitarian police state now. If the government could read our thoughts, they'd try to control them as they do our words and actions, like the police did with young Andrew Meyer here. The government has done a fantastic job of invading the heads of the American people and 'guiding' us towards the proper way to think and look at things. We are all being controlled in ways that most people don't even realize. Free country? HA! The joke's on us. Wake up and smell the coffee, fellow homeland comrades.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

michael T — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:33:53 GMT

I wish I could tase the idiot.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Jeff, Canada — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:35:44 GMT

Hey, Ryan T-bury ma.
Don't send your stupid people to Canada; we've got plenty here already! Even with all our open land we couldn't hold that many people.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

A.D. Raleigh, NC — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:36:24 GMT

Just saying that OUR free speech AGAIN has been hampered in some way. Even John Kerry (unsuccesfully) tried to get the PD to hold back. No Matter how it was presented Myer had the RIGHT to speak and to ask questions...which I am sure NONE of them were answered. Meyer may have been looking for attention he may have been obnoxious and he may have been disrespectful but he still has the right to speak his mind. THAT IS WHAT FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION AND SPEECH IS ALL ABOUT!!! Now, you can speak freely as long as NOBODY gets offended or upset. The police were PROBABLY acting on orders from someone behind the scenes who did't want Kerry to have to deal with "tough" questions.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Mark S. — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:37:59 GMT

Another perfect example of the government regulating our First amendment rights. What gives the police the right to use lethal force (yes, a taser can be lethal) on someone who defends their beliefs by verbally challenging the views of someone who has the potential to make changes in our government? I believe that the police are just as corrupted as the criminals. It is also my belief that in the near future we are going to see a great increase in violence toward police officers. The majority of the people are becoming extremely tired of police abusing their given power. The police do as they please with no regard to the law or society as a whole. They only do what benefits their own. They have no respect, no honor, no integrity, no courage, and are no longer competant in providing protection to the innocent. They will however, tase the innocent.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

al pambuena, fort myers beach, fl. — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:39:03 GMT

man.....is this the bottom of the pit for news. ok this nut ball has had his 15min....stop please..i beg you bro....

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

College Bro, USA — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:39:43 GMT

Campus police have an itchy trigger finger...stupid frat boys help scratch that itch.

He got what he deserved. He caused a ruckus, he resisted, the hand of the chubby blue line came down on him.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Michael Nunez, Lafayette, Louisiana — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:39:50 GMT

I can't understand how someone can see this...FROM ANY ANGLE...and just blow it off as, "he's an idiot, looking for attention". So what if he is...This is FREAKING SCARY. The guy is a student, asking a question, in a place of higher learning...this IS WHAT IS SUPPOSSED TO HAPPEN. What does he learn? That if you ask the wrong question, the government will come down on you. FREE SPEACH?!!!! MAN, this is an example of a police state...NOTHING LESS!!!
I would expect to this happening in North Korea, or China...people this IS AMERICA, how can you just blow this off?!!!
Wait till it happens to you...OH Just another idiot.

SCARY. NOTHING LESS. He has nothing to appologize for.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Mark, Fort Lauderdale FL — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:40:03 GMT

I am sad by the very realty people are so able to give up there rights without a fight. Sometimes I think the stupid dumbed down idiots of this country deserve the dictator that is comming and the complete loss of liberty. We live in a police state now that is preparing the people for what is comming. Scary...very scary.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

CDH, Denver, CO — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:40:42 GMT

I find it interesting that people are justifying this by saying "he was annoying," "he was just looking for attention" or "he should have just done what the cops said."

We are supposed to trust law enforcement individuals. I don't care if you are annoying, attention-seeking, smelly, ugly, or any other disagreable thing, that doesn't justify trained individuals whose job it is to KEEP THE PEACE, not "clean the world of uppity people" to use excess force to subdue you. He could not have overpowered ALL of those officers- it was like he was getting a "spanking" or something.

As for resisting arrest, I'd get a little upset too if I was being pulled down from the podium asking a question at an event that was supposed to be about asking questions! I don't see where he did anything wrong, other than being a little over-excited or a bit annoying about his topic. I've seen tons of people like that at Q&A's- they get nervous. Only difference is, they are not asking "big" questions that bother people... hence they don't get tased!

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Not Convinced, SC — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:40:56 GMT

Look, he was being unruly in a peaceful public gathering. The police's intention was probably just to detain him and get him to calm down. He got himself in trouble when he wouldn't cooperate. They tased him while he was on the ground because he continued to resist. All I'm saying is, if the police were being "too aggressive," etc, they would have gone in there and tased him from the start. Anyone waving the "Oppressive govt. state" flag is being way too dramatic. Let's have our Law Enforcement take a vacation for a while and watch society go down the toilet, then you'll sing a different tune.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Harold Spake, Norman, OK — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:41:16 GMT

Citizens have a right to free speech and that right is guaranteed in the First Amendment Amendment to our Constitution where it says no laws may be made abridging the right to free speech. What it doesn't say is the government, in this case taking the form of the campus police, can't unlawfully try to silence you. With the exception of screaming fire in a crowded theater the police have no business monitoring speech. It's too bad the young man resisted an unlawful order issued by the police. If he had left without incident and taken the police and the university to court, the cause of free speech would have been better served. As for the matter of police brutality, the police appeared to be calm, professional and certainly not enraged. The women officers were especially effective at quieting Mr. Meyer. Using a taser to immobilize an attacker is preferable to shooting, but using a taser on someone who is already restrained is barbaric. The question this event raises, is do the police have the authority to restrict free speech? I belive not, and the police were wrong to say this young man was inciting a riot.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Charles Boyer; Brooklyn ; N.Y. — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:41:52 GMT

REMEMBER KENT STATE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Neil Nagy, Phoenix, AZ. — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:44:20 GMT

Regardless that Myers is obnoxious, does NOT constitute the physical force and torture the Nazi, anti freedom of speech, Right wing, Neo-con police who seem to be labeled heros of our time, and are here to protect us and NOT stifle our civel rights.
John Kerry offered to answer the questions posed to him, and force was the not the sort of thing a liberal would endorse. Only people on the right want to prevent free speech and freedom and will muscle it into your life whether you want it or not. Just look at who is leading this country and see how the shift to secrecy, fear, and loss of freedom has affected us during this administration.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Mike Garcia, Toronto, Ontario — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:46:25 GMT

Thank God I'm Canadian.I was in Florida for two weeks and the level of violence that I saw from watching the news made me want to leave early. Free speach anyone?

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Chuck Mo — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:48:17 GMT

Some of these folks have been watching too many of these slacker films and shows where someone stands up and says something stupid or does something obnoxious just to get attention. It looks cool in the movies and in fantasy land but in the real world these are the consequences. He got his fifteen minutes of flame!!!!!

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

dave, Chicago — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:49:04 GMT

"I also feel that the officers acted justly to tazering this student. He should be punished somehow."

This comment sent a chill down my spine. In the USA, the police are not charged with punishing anyone. That is up to our court system to decide. This young man, breaking no law, is suddenly tased for what reason? Speaking in a public forum? Is that really an offense in the USA now? I missed the change to the 1st amendment if that's the case.

The important part of this story is now every single person getting up in front of a microphone will be afraid he or she will get wrestled to the ground and tased for asking the wrong question. Is that good for our country?

Do you, Gerald Boswell, trust Mrs. Clinton as with the same powers you trust George Bush? If not, then you should be concerned that you are the next one to be tasered.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Brian Oswalt - Bellingham WA — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:49:50 GMT

The subject was intentionally trying to disrupt a lawful assembly, which is considered breach of peace or disorderly conduct in most states. He was asked repeatedly to leave but refused. The officers tried to escort him out but he struggled and continued to resist. The officers took him to the ground but he refused to allow his hands to be placed behind his back.

Now the officers have two choices, use physical force to over come his resistance (IE hitting him) or apply a short drive stun from a tazer to gain comliance. The tazer has no long term effects, as soon as it is removed or shut off, the person is fine. This is the perfect use for such a control device, it ensures the suspect and the officers are not injured.

You people are so quick to critisize but if you looked into police use of force policies and procedures, you'd see this was actually much safer for the subject. Of course, he could have obeyed their lawful order and been walked out of the hall.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Mick, Chicago IL — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:51:10 GMT

Tasering was not enough. This idiot deprived the other people in attendance from hearing what Sen. Kerry was trying to say, as such I believe he should have been tied, bound and gagged and left on public display for about a week (without food or water, of course).

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Bubba, New York, New York — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:54:45 GMT

we have the right to ask questions about crooked politicians. i've even noticed many comments i've tried to blog, not showing up. our freedom of speech is being violated more and more everyday. even though this guy may have been immature, kerry should answer his questions. i assume this kid is a paying college student, so he has more rights there then kerry, kerry is a guest on his campus. the police our always power hungry everywhere and they clearly violated this guys rights. Bush and the Clintons have also been "selective" of who they invite to their so called "public forums". they are not really public people. when you see them on t.v. giving speeches, it's totally biased. no one objects in the audience, because they are prescreened and quickly escorted out if they don't agree. this is called communism people. they are taking the power out of the hands of the people and clearly breaking the law while doing so. these ignorant people keep voting for these people and our rights are being slowly taken away. whether this guy is an a**hole or not, has nothing to do with how the police broke the law brutalizing this guy. what is the justification of the tazer? i hope this guy takes this to the supreme court and brings the police and UF accountability for some responsbility for violating human rights.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Matt Dodson, Dallas, Texas — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:55:31 GMT

Myers must have extreme strength so that 4 plus officers couldn't restrain him and feel the need to then electrocute this AMERICAN citizen for exercising his right to free speech. When did excessive force become acceptable in the good ole' U.S. of A. anyways? No question he was loud and obnoxious, but really, does the FDLE truly believe that this was necessary action taken to protect officers and citizens. NO! It is the government trying to COVER ITS A$$ like always. It is a tragedy when an American citizen must apoligize for exercising a right supposedly put in place and protected by our "GOVERNMENT"....what a joke!!

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Jon from Chicago.the greatest place on earth — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:56:29 GMT

He was looking for a fight to get attention. I am not a Kerry supporter. This guy has a history of doing these things and if you push hard enough, it will happen. He resisted when they asked him after numerous requests to leave. He was taking up too much time. Plain and simple, he was looking for a fight to get publicity. The job of the police is to serve and protect. Remember, they are there in the moment and do not know what this irrational person could or would do. They took appropriate measures to restrain the individual. Trust me, he was tazed with a weak tazer. If he was hit with a street tazer, he would have been on the ground for several minutes and unable to speak or move. He got what he deserved. Freedom of Speach, Yes, Freedom to be an idiot, No.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Roger Walker — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:58:00 GMT

What is crazy is that nobody is taking about his questions. What did he say? On the video, it is very hard to understand. Is there a transcript?

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Wake Up — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:58:46 GMT

I don't really have an opinion on what happened. I do however, after reading some of these posts whining about how police act have an opinion. When was the last time you put your life on the line at your job? Most of you, probably NEVER. these guys go out of their house everyday and have to walk a tight rope between worrying what some activist group is going to do to them for doing their job, and worrying what welfare, uneducated, crack head is going to try to do to maime, or kill them. bottom line is, if you act correctly, you will never have to deal with the police. I would guess most of the people who complain about the police are the ones who are indeed disrespectful, and basically of no use to society itself. Quit all the whining. We would all be speaking German right now if those who were around during WW2 were like the "noise makers" in america today. Shut Up!

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

tase this, tampa, florida — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:59:50 GMT

what would have happened ten or fifteen years ago before tasers? would the police have not been able to arrest him? four police officers, all physically fit, all trained in apprehension and arrest, and these four cops could not subdue this one UNARMED man? the taser is a weak police officer's friend...a crutch. in the old days, the police officers would have jumped on him, hand cuffed him, done and done....maybe a sprain, maybe the man would have even broken an arm, but tasers can kill, period. these police officers were cowards, ill trained, and do not belong in uniform. they are a disgrace. then again, they're police officers in florida where men and women in uniform get away w/murder (check out the boot camp murder). i've had law enforcement in my family for years....none of them needed a taser. shame on those officers. and shame on kerry (a war veteran???) for not jumping off that stage and telling the officers to leave the poor idiot alone. and when we all have more time, lets talk about freedom of speech....officers tase a young idiot at a college campus who is asking a question loudly, but they do nothing when westboro baptist church members yell profanities at soldiers funerals. wake up america.....something is not right here!

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Isaac, Coeur d'Alene, ID — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:01:50 GMT

In a post Bobby Kennedy world you have to keep situations well under control when guarding politicians. Oh, and for the record, cops who use tasers are shocked with them before they are certified to carry them (same for olioresincapsicum, aka pepper spray)

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

BonaFide — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:02:26 GMT

He was not tazed for speaking his mind, he was tased for causing a disturbance, not obeying officers orders and being resistant. This is not about freedom of speech. If he wants to go write a novel about what he thinks, or appear on talk shows etc, no one will stop him. He has the right to free speech, but he doesnt have the right to disrupt the public forum.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Mongo Lloyd, Devonia, o-HI-o — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:02:31 GMT

Watch the video. Meyer did nothing wrong to give the initial cause for the police to grab him. Granted, he asked a long-winded question, and his mic was cut. When his mic was cut, he was immediately grabbed by at least 2 police officers, which rapidly turned into a MOB of police officers. Clearly, heavy-handed tactics were the order of the day. Meyer's subsequent reactions were completely reasonable, in the context of what was happening... which is why charges were not pressed against him.

All the folks saying "Meyer is an idiot" are idiots themselves. I have experienced similar neo-Nazi tactics from police on two occasions in my lifetime. In response to my girlfriend's complaints about trespassing, harassment and vandalism to her property by commercial marijuana growers, threats of filing false, baseless charges were made against me by one officer (a self-described "close family friend" of the commerical marijuana growers), who ended up being fired after I filed an official complaint. On another occasion, after handcuffing me (with no resistance) and pounding my face into a brick wall, I was threatened that, if I did not give police statements, they would prepare evidence against me to ensure a conviction. They did just that, and falsified evidence, which was later determined to be tampered evidence, and was thrown out.

In the early 1980's, I used to watch the San Diego Police Department beat up winos in the early morning hours, in their attempt to clean up the downtown area. I saw them regularly kick, billy-club, and stomp on passed-out winos, who were not threatening anyone.

America is almost a police state. Falsifying evidence and charges and strongarm tactics occur in police states, not democracies. Our police have been trained with military tactics and equipment, not to attack "terrorists", but rather to use against the population: YOU. It's easy to call the victim an idiot. I suspect those who do call Meyer an idiot will likely scream louder than Meyer did, when THEY find themselves in the crosshairs of an out-of-control (in)justice system at no fault of their own.

There have been hundreds of examples of our out-of-control (in)justice system, just in the last decade, and many thousands in my lifetime. It appears that the incidents are increasing and are becoming more brazen. Cops most definitely perceive the world in an "us vs them" manner. I have heard many direct statements from cops that support this, such as "I will not say anything against a fellow brother-at-arms". Cops look at average Americans as "perps".

If the police view our society in this manner (and they do), only an idiot would not view them with equal suspicion.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Dave, Windsor, CA — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:02:33 GMT

Well, since we have no idea if "Keats from Walnut Creek, CA" is a threat to anyone, I say we violently restrain him and tase him until he apologises. After all, the pain goes away, so it must be OK!

These police were brutal, out-of-control thugs from any angle. Meyer may be a total jerk and may have been out of line, but he was within his rights. Remember those?

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

J Hall , Houston,Tx — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:03:16 GMT

This guy is an idiot. AS far as all you milktoast , liberals. Get off your _ _ _ and do something real. You must live in a vacumn bottle Wisconsin. Its okay for people to resist legal arrest, run from ( and kill innocent people)and do whatever we want in the name of " free speech or expression" Your all idiots.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

From the heart, USA — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:03:34 GMT

Tasers don't only penetrate your nervous system with 50,000 volts, but Hundreds die from being tased...Check out Amnetsy International. Because of this incident I now know of the Skull and Bones Secret Society. Thanks to one BRAVE soul!!!

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

BonaFide — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:03:53 GMT

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Steve Melton, Nashville Tennessee — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:04:29 GMT

From his behavior, he knew that the cop wannabes would respond with a specific response. The blame falls squarely on this idiot. He chose the place and time to have this confrontation, It was the equivalent of sticking a fork into a light socket. What a Dumdazz.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Joseph, Baltimore Maryland — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:05:30 GMT

To F. Raymond (Sent Thursday, November 01, 2007 2:25 AM.
Sounds like you may need need a psych evaluation,
and a reality check.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Raul Munguia, Mexico City, Mexico — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:07:09 GMT

If this guy wants to exercise his right to free speech, let him organize his own tour instead of complaining why Kerry gets to speak two hours and he can only ask three questions. I don't understand why he thinks he deserves to speak for two hours like Kerry had....

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

A little duck in a Big Pond — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:07:46 GMT

As long as they don't want any clergy to attend the book signings; they aren't treading any testy ground with tasering the outspoken public. But I don't think room security was enhanced by commotion and confusion, do you?

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Jill, Waynesboro,PA — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:09:51 GMT

I have many comments I could make in response to this issue but I will settle for one. The only thing anyone can say he did wrong was to not relinquish the mic in a reasonable amount of time and to have exceeded his "time limit". I have been watching the presidential debates and am astounded at how when the 30 seconds is up for the canidates the media likes to follow they just let them keep on talking, yet when a canidate with something true and important gets to 29 seconds they instantly cut him off while all the rest have been cracking jokes in the background. People don't want to hear the truth because it angers them and they get even more angry when "real citizens and patriots" defend it. The truth will set you free but as long as we supress it we will never be a free country.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Alex, Maryland — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:10:27 GMT

Eventually something like this will happen again, but someone who is offended will have a gun and it will be the Police who are subdued. Just wait. Meyer seemed like he was being a whackjob, but he definitely wasn't causing a major problem and was not a threat. He did not need to be neutralized with a taser. I often side with the Police in these types of scenarios, but this one I would side with the whackjob. Seriously Meyer, you get a chance to talk to Kerry and you ask about Skull and Bones? WTH

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

VJ — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:10:56 GMT

they should have kicked his teeth in too. what a jackass. I am top of the list of Bush haters and I also believe he stole both elections. but this kid so obviously set it up and was looking for publicity for himself. he is very clever and deceitful and he got what he deserved.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

John, Salem, Wisconsin — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:11:48 GMT

This guy is a self aggrandizing, self important, idiot who sees himself as some sort of activist, when all he is is an opinionated loud mouth.

Did the cops do right in tazing him... damn skippy!

Look, a cop tells you to shut up and walk out, you shut up and walk out. You don't argue, you don't yell, you don't wave your arms around like a madman.

Everybody knows an animal is most dangerous when it's cornered, same goes for people. This guy, by his own statements at the time, thought he was being led away to be killed. sounds like he felt cornered to me!

The cops here have no idea what this guy is capable of, and if zapping this guy to defuse the situation and bring him under control means those cops and everyone around them are safe and make it home ok afterwards, then it was a well founded use of force.

If that guy was a real whack, and in the scuffle had managed to snatch a cops gun and squeeze off a round or two, the whole world would be asking why the cops didn't do more to get him under control to start with... like taze him.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

David Summerly, Shawnee, Kansas — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:12:33 GMT

Welcome to our facist police state.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Louis Roundtree, Phoenix, Az. — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:13:48 GMT

ok, it seems to have been left out that he arrived AFTER the questioning session was ended, but was still given a chance to ask a question, THEN he went over his time and his microphone was cut off, as it had been for everyone else that had gone over time. He THEN refused the orders of the security officials on the scene. He then RESISTED being removed, and continued to resist after being put on the ground. A taser was a better option than officers or the assailent getting injured during a physical confrontation. This was not a free speech issue on any level, he was not tased because he was asking questions nor was he tased at the request of John Kerry. He was tased becaused he violated the rules of the venue and the directions of the officers charged with maintaining order at a public event. The apology he gave was due.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Michael Thomas, Castleton, Vermont — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:16:07 GMT

This is not about a taser. This is not about justice. This is not about American law. This is about basic human rights.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

raguirre — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:17:34 GMT

The guy's an idiot, the security guys are idiots - wht do you expect other than an idiotic result.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

R.C. Beaumont, TX — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:18:05 GMT

Where was all the outrage when hundreds of peaceful protesters were "arrested" in New York the day the RNC convention was started, then released after the convention and all charges dropped? How about all the times people are arrested just for speaking out against Bush? And everyone is upset because some loudmouthed punk wanted some fame? It is obvious this was a staged act on his part. This is small time when compared to what the feds have been doing the past six years. Be afraid. Be very afraid.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Dwoods, Dallas — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:18:14 GMT

I think the police where way out of line. My problem is I don't understand why they even approached this guy, so what if the suit in the front row was waving for the police to cut the guy off, since when did the guy in the front row tell me what I can and can't here? It was a was a public forum with the senator, he can ask any question he wants right? To me the problem started when one man decided (forget about free speech) it was time for this guy to shut-up. It's all the guy in the front rows fault!!

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

rick calistoga CA — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:18:31 GMT

what shocks me is that there are so many entries in this blog that support the actions of the campus police.....that is really sad and i guess indicative of the fact that there are still some who support the end justifying the means (and i'm implying this incident does) who do not have enough confidence in their system that allows it to operate as intended.....with this example of free speech (which has nothing to do with whether you like the words or not....we all have to deal with that!), this young man, nervous or grandstanding or seeking attention - (those are irrelevant), was not being a threat to anyone. i've not seen the videos promoted here, but i did watch about 4 or 5 videos of the incident when it was more current, including what happened after he was taken away. he was rightfully scared.......if you were being non violent and expressing what in anyones' mind would be your constitutional right, then you were forcefully handled, taken down, having 600lbs+ of police on you, arm locked, then tazed.....how would you feel? come on guys and gals who think this guy was a phoney! he was completely in his rights. i think the blogger who wrote that this was kidnapping has a great point!

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

alan riley, NYC — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:19:46 GMT

Where do you draw the line for "free speech"? If I were to interupt a concert, ballet, or play with my personal political message, I would expect to be arrested for disordely conduct. This attention seeker hijacked the forum.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

JIMBOS — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:19:48 GMT

THERE ARE MORE AND MORE GOVERNMENTAL CONTROLS HEADING OUR WAY. IT IS THE NATURE OF GOV TO CONTROL THE MASSES. THIS CAN BE THRU ADVERTISING, CERTAIN LAWS, PUBLIC OPINION. I CANNOT BELIEVE THE PEOPLE THAT WILL RUSH OUT TO FIGHT IN A WAR THAT SOME TURKEY SAYS...IT MUST BE. IT'S GOOD TO BE PRO AMERICAN BUT, CAN YOU EXPLAIN WHY? CAN YOU, AT THE SAME TIME, EXPLAIN WHY, ALL OF A SUDDEN, IT WAS A GOOD AND LOGICAL THING TO RUSH INTO IRAQ? 'CAUSE SOMEBODY SAID SO? KIND OF BLIND BELIEF, NO? THAT MAKES THOSE INDIVIDUALS SHEEP.
WONDER NO MORE ABOUT NO PITY FOR "SOLDIERS"..........

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Mike Santoro — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:20:30 GMT

The larger question begs to be asked. Why was he even approached by law enforcement in the first place? He didn't get out of hand until after he was dragged away. Some goodquestions were raised. He is a true patriot.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

CDP Texas USA — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:27:25 GMT

Have you ever tried to remove a man by walking out of a building while he is fighting? It's not that easy! They kick, scream, scratch, bite, etc. The taser is a tool to get then under control so NO ONE gets injured, including the police! Yes a shot from taser looks bad, but there is no injury. The questioning session was over and he should have shut up and sat down!

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Gary Denny, Fanny Bay. B.C., Canada — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:28:28 GMT

Come to Canada. The RCMP and Police regularly taser people here with people dying from this jolt. Yeah its sickening to watch our brave police handcuff somebody on the ground then tasor them. Boy how they can sleep at night is a mystery. I guess when you have no feelings for people and are a moral bankrupt its easy.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Brandon, MPLS, MN — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:29:08 GMT

So, we've established that you hippie liberals think it is okay to go to a civilized event and be a jackass. But, what would you think if the officers would have gotten into a prolonged struggle with this punk and broke his arm!? At least he was fine after his five second ride. I am a cop and I have been tazed (not tased) and I think it's pretty ridiculous that you people second guess those cops having not been there. I also tend to believe that the punk kid had an agenda at that event!

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Groundwork — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:30:03 GMT

How do all these wrongs add up?
1. Show-off willing to do anything for the publicity - what a set-up.
2. Police tasing a person who's already pinned down and not about to go anywhere. Sad note: we're seeing more and more of this over-reaching of reasonable force by the police (and a few others we see on the front page of the papers).
3. An overabundance of media coverage (of course, they DO have an awful lot of broadcast minutes to fill up).
4. And we're all getting crankier and crankier.
Prognosis...not good.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

AUNT MILLIE — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:32:04 GMT

DEMOCRACY AT WORK

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

aztecamama — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:34:14 GMT

fil·i·bus·ter

noun (plural fil·i·bus·ters)
Definition:

1. political delaying tactic: a tactic used to delay or prevent the passage of legislation, e.g. a long irrelevant speech

Now, whether he was up there being an "...idiot looking for attention and lookiNg to start trouble! He didn't get enough attention as a child, that's why he is still acting like one" or not, he still has rights. Our representatives do it all the time in an open forum - waste time to prevent legislation. The longest time waster on record? Strom Thurmond. He holds a Senate record of 24 hours and 18 minutes of filibuster speaking to prevent a vote on the 1957 Civil Rights Bill. No one tackled him (though he did get into a fight with "...Texas Senator Ralph Yarborough after he tried to drag Thurmond to his committee seat to vote on Civil Rights legislation") - for more on this please visit http://www.answers.com/topic/strom-thurmond.

The point is, we, like our senators, have a right to speak as long as we want to, what we want to say and not be punished for it. This kid didn't incite a riot. He may or may not have been wasting time, personally, I think the arrest opened some eyes and that's never a waste of time. The police were way overzealous and Kerry should have stepped out of his political character and saved this kid. This isn't what we should expect to receive when we speak our minds. We shouldn't be afraid of government intervention when we speak our minds.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

MS — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:34:24 GMT

Markk - Cops who carry Tasers ARE required to be tased before they can carry one. Take this from the wife of a cop who carries one. I have personally seen the marks on his back from the Taser. They are required to be Tased. Do some more research before you run your mouth.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

GB, Georgia — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:34:44 GMT

The kid was a jerk and personally I wouldn't want him around me. However, he was at a Politcal Q & A session and by the very nature of that forum any question is fair game. The reason is, is that we need to know about a possible future leader of our country and while some people may not understand why a particular question is being asked, it is important to the person asking it and should be allowed. In fact I will go as far as saying that their questions must be allowed so that any falicies the political hopeful has is exposed so we know the strenghts and weaknesses of our leaders. Also, while the Meyer was being obnoxious, the police had no right to touch him in any way shape or form. He was not doing anything illegal and to those that say the obnoxiousness and grandstanding should be punished, I say that if you had been treated that way when you were younger and were obnoxious and grandstanding you would be in jail right now by your professed attitude. Everyone, except with a very few instances, when they are young do things to get attention and to make a scene. However in this case, while distasteful, it was entirely appropriate, purely because of the political nature of the rally or Q & A. If, as a country, we start silenceing everything we don't like merely because we don't like it, soon there will be no country of ours left anymore that we would recognize. So the point is, Meyer is annoying, but he did not infringe upon anybody's rights or hurt them in any way. In fact by bringing up those questions that may not have gotten asked anywhere else he may have actually done us all a favor. The favor is that we now know there may be something "up" with Sen. Kerry. I don't go into conspiracy theories, but I do know from the Swiftboat Veterans against Kerry that he did in fact, leave his fellow soldiers to save his on hide in a fire fight, and he also wrote in himself, posing as another soldier, to recomend himself for commendations. And as for the idea that just because the police are detaining you, you should cooperate, well in most cases yes that is true. But in a case such as this when the person clearly did no wrong, it is up to the citezens to dissent and protect their freedoms. As Thomas Jefferson once said "the tree of liberty must from time to time be refreshed with the blood of patriots and tyrants." That simply means that we always have to be vigilent and wary that our freedoms will be taken away or willingly given up for one reason or another. Many times it's in the name of the public good. However the government can't truly protect you. You must protect yourself and it is a constant surveying of what is occuring around us that allows us to protect ourselves because we can determine for ourselves what action needs to be taken.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

annelouise — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:35:21 GMT

It was all fake and staged by the guy. (no, the cops weren't in on it) Taze hell, I believe in the old fashioned way of cracking the nightstick over his head. Its so obvious that anyone who doesn't see it is dim witted.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Joey, Seattle, WA — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:38:13 GMT

To any ignorant miscreant, who thinks that this guy should have been "tased" for merely asking a question, has obviously been indoctrinated & is now one of sheople. This man has a Constitutional right- a God-given right to ask any bloody question!

Wake up America & say hello to the Gestapo USA...

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Common Sense, Northwest, Indiana — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:38:34 GMT

Where does it say that the police must wrestle people who resist them? They are given tazers to control situations AND prevent injury. If you don't want to get tazed, pull yourself together. It wasn't a suprize, the police gave him many chances to stop him disruptive behavoir before tazing him.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

I respect law enforcement, Boston, MA — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:39:35 GMT

You people who think the police did anything wrong are insane! He was resisting! If you don't put your hands behind your back to be cuffed, you are resisting! It doesn't matter if you don't agree with why you are being arrested! You are resisting! Put your hands behind your back and let a judge throw out the arrest!! If the cops are wrong, they will be punished and you will get off scott free. As for the tasing, it is a momentary shock of pain to make you submit. Many police departments do in fact require officers to be tased in order to carry the weapon. He's also lucky he didn't get a face full of pepper spray for not shutting up after they arrested him because in some states that is disturbing the peace.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

John, Kansas — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:39:40 GMT

There were enough cops to simply pick him up and carry him outside so I believe the use of the tazer was excessive. If he wouldn't have been so loud and not been excessively excited he might have got his 3 questions answered without to much trouble.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Meyer Posed A Very Real Threat, Denver, CO — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:39:57 GMT

"He was exercising his First Amendment rights and posed no threat to anyone."

You've got to be kidding! Andrew Meyer wasn't just asking questions, he was VERY aggressive and agitated. Given his highly irrational, emotional display, the police acted properly to PROTECT KERRY FROM WHAT COULD HAVE EASILY BEEN AN ASSASINATION ATTEMPT OR A PHYSICAL ATTACK!

In this case, the police were doing their job properly and made the right decision.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

eab, Toronto — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:41:48 GMT

If the military wants to protect our liberties, I
think the real test is at home. They were deployed just for that reason. Have you noticed the states are deprived of their National Guard, their official
militia? Our freedoms are under more threat here than
anywhere. And politeness may just be a sign of
cowardice, if not brainwashing. A free person has the
duty to challenge authority, because that is from where
the authority derives...

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

t lo, austi, tx — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:42:05 GMT

I think we should all wear t-shirts that say, "don't taze me bro" in public outrage at Homeland Security empowering tax paid PD's to act like terroist police -it is a culture out of control. That said,the students demeanor was not effective for engaging response, but did not warrant tazering. What next, the brown note machine?

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Jonathan Apple, Chicago, IL — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:42:58 GMT

This incident is disturbing because those who are sworn to "uphold the peace" react violently in a non-violent situation. The student is obviously blowing off steam when the officers decide to get involved. Then, the video clearly shows the student holding both his hands in the air, the universal sign for non-agression. The officers used aggression and a weapon to respond to a bunch of hot air. For the officers the use of force is not a sign of strength, but a sign of weakness. Shame on you.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Steven Montello, San Jose, CA — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:44:12 GMT

I thought that tazers were given to replace the use of guns, so if they didn’t have the tazer would they have shot him?

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Heather, Gainesville, FL — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:44:14 GMT

Meyer used profanity, was unruly and would not follow the rules. The police asked him to comply and he would not. We should not question the police for their actions but rather question the actions of Meyer. I for one am glad he has lawyer fees to pay for his actions since there will be no charges against him. He embarassed the University of Florida and our GatorNation, he is lucky to still be a student here, he should have been expelled for his actions. He got off easy with only paying lawyer fees.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Joseph Williams, Baltimore Maryland — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:44:37 GMT

Sorry, but I see the same thing occurring in all 3 angles.

An obnoxious speaker being dragged away.
After resisting and protesting, he is forced to the ground.
Once on the ground (subdued), he is then electrocuted.

It is that last part that I have trouble with. He was out manned, overpowered and on the ground. Thus (to me) it seems that the final step becomes excessive.

I understand that it was a tense moment and the security had to make a judgment call, so I don't really blame them. But I hope that (with the videos) in hindsight we can see that perhaps there were other ways to handle the situation that are a bit less totalitarian.

When we as a society become desensitized to free speech being met with force, we are just a stones throw away from become more like Myanmar.

P.F. , WPB, Florida (Sent Wednesday, October 31, 2007 7:25 PM)

I don't believe the University of Florida police should have been exonerated. They tasered a student for asking three questions to former presidential candidate and Mass. Senator John Kerry. Kerry said he was willing to answer the questions. Meyer would not have scuffled with police if they didn't try to tackle him after asking questions. What they did was totally inappropriate.
Phil, Garwood, New Jersey (Sent Wednesday, October 31, 2007 7:26 PM)

I don't understand what you are driving at. None of these videos changed my opinion at all?
James, Corvallis, OR (Sent Wednesday, October 31, 2007 7:29 PM)

cops are getting all to many toys that they are over anxious to use
marion hobbs new mexico (Sent Wednesday, October 31, 2007 7:33 PM)

This is one of the most blatant examples of police brutality I've seen in a long time. It also shows that free speech is for those that can afford it. If you aren't saying what the powers that be want to here you will be punished. Since when did the U.S. turn into cold war Russia
Brian Krieger, Tucson, AZ (Sent Wednesday, October 31, 2007 7:33 PM)

I agree with these people and I am an ex cop who left the police force after 5 years because I didn't like seeing the way citizens were being treated by the Police; I'm doing very well as a Degreed IT Network Specialist now, thank you.
Being a little loud, speaking up for yourself, asking an unpopular question, being a certain age or race, having a certain financial background, a member of a certain political party, a prior conviction or just being an ass looking for attention is no excuse for the Police to react/act in this way and are not trained or at least, were not trained to handle a situation like this in this way.
All the bigger cops had to do was escort him out, physically restrain him if he posed harm to any one or himself, which I did not see.
He didn't have a weapon and didn't lunge or take a fighting stance.
"Oh, but he resisted arrest".
There wasn't too much resisting that this guy could have done against a couple of bigger cops that already had a good hold on him.
Sometimes cops have to wrestle a little with an uncooperative person to get the cuffs on, that's the way things are, but in a short time (many against one) the cuffs are in place and the person is hauled away unless he is pumped up on PCP which also was clearly not the case.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Robb W - Portland, Oregon — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:44:45 GMT

Just another example of those in charge not willing to allow us, The People, to speak Truth to Power. This was a truly disgusting act lost in the noise of the criminal acts of our current administration.

Unfortunately, some of the comments here are graphic examples of how the current criminal government was able to assume and then hold the power that they so crave, above all other things.

If we've lost our Freedom of Speech (remember the "quaint" Constitution?), what do we have left? Disgusting.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Jason, Portland Maine — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:46:22 GMT

Clearly politicians can't be asked questions that they don't want to answer.

If I was in Meyers shoe's the power abusing cops would have had more of a problem on their hands as I would have not resisted, but asked why my freedom of speech was being taken from me.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Stephen Comfort-Mason — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:46:30 GMT

Anyone who uses "Bro" when addressing those to whom they are not related deserves to be zapped...

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

JR, Los Angeles, CA — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:46:58 GMT

Did any of you see the guy in the first ailse seat in the center turn around and look back and give a cut sign toward his throat meaning to his staff to shut this person up. How interesting....

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Molly — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:47:28 GMT

The guidelines for the forum were set, he chose to not abide. Funny how you don't see what happened before the cameras came on.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Seth Chattanooga TN — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:53:27 GMT

The lesson here today is: Keep your mouth shut. Don't voice your opinion. Don't speak your mind and don't think. If you do, you get tazed. Freedom of Speech is officially dead in the good ol' U.S. of A. Right to privacy: GONE! Freedom of Speech: On it's way out. Next will be our right to bear arms. That's when we're REALLY gonna be in trouble!

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Disgusted — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:55:37 GMT

To those who condem the police for tasing that idiot....are you nuts??...Meyer was not just trying to ask some questions....he wouldn't SHUT UP long enough for Senator Kerry, (or anyone else for that matter)...to answer any question he may have had...He was obnoxious, rude and generally just putting on a "horse and pony show"....Meyer got what he deserved.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Mike Cohn, Tampa, FL — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:55:42 GMT

People need to read the actual police report. He was causing a disruption much earlier than the start of the videotapes. The organizers and the police actually had restraint in allowing him his earlier disruptions.

http://i.a.cnn.net/cnn/2007/images/09/18/offense.report.072274.pdf

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Patrick Gondek, Birmingham, Alabama — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:58:31 GMT

For all of you who think this was a case of free speech suppressed, you don't understand the meaning of free speech. Even Meyer's admits he crossed the line from free speech into being an unwanted distraction who was out of control. He stated this during his interview with Matt Lauer, and in his letters of apology.

There is never any excuse for resisting the police and he should have been prosecuted for fighting with them as he did.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Mike, Los Angeles, CA — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:59:55 GMT

Kerry is a lying, conniving, jerk. They should have tased him and taken him to jail. That would be a good start.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Dan Craig — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 17:00:44 GMT

Seriously!! I thought the video was GREAT!!! Should Andrew Meyer ever be awarded monies? Yea, about $100,000 from "America's Funniest Video's." I never laughed so hard!!!

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Eric Waukegan Illinois — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 17:02:28 GMT

It is unfortunate that those officers were doing what they were "Told" to do. Those Officers did not just decide to "ATTACK" This person because they wanted to abuse their authority, play with their "TOYS" (hardee har har) or had nothing better to do. They were assigned to be at this function because there are people who like to target "Public Figures" deliberatley so some form of Police Authority is necessary to provide security. Of course who is there to protect the Police from being abused for doing their job. Why don't you strap on the Badge if you can "DO IT BETTER"

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Denis, West Chester, Pa — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 17:03:04 GMT

Kerry should be embarassed that he didn't step up and use his influence to disfuse the situation. Furthermore, those security guards should be given more schooling on how to make the right decision on a whim!

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Robert Simpson, Havelock. North Carolina. — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 17:03:55 GMT

This man had no right to commandeer the forum and stage this publicity stunt. He was told to stop repeatedly and didn't. Most opinions here reflect the lack of dicipline, consideration for others and the disrespect for authority that infects our society today.........and is getting worse.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Gunners Mate USN — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 17:06:07 GMT

tazers only kill or cause serious injury if the person has a heart condition or is applied for an excessive amount of time. i have studied electronics and how electricity affects the human body...tazers are ballanced such that they only cause severe pain when applied for a short time...voltage doesn't kill it's the amps (current) that do that...however the longer you apply a voltage the more you chance causing the heart to stop...so in that sense tazers are not dangerous in trained hands, and i feel that the officers acted appropriatly in the fact that this "kid" was struggling and they were unable to fully restrain him, however i also believe that he wasn't actually "tazed" because when tazed you cannot say anything like oh "OW" the most you can do is sit there and let your body sieze up...that is how a tazer works is it causes every muscle in the body to tighten...including the vocal cords.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Steve, NH — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 17:08:45 GMT

His right to free speech was infringed - period. The cops should NOT have used the taser on him after he was restrained. The most shameful aspect of the whole event is that he was forced into Apologize for exercising his freedom of speech in order to avoid prosecution. It’s a precedent folks – regardless of his intentions or actions.

‘Don’t Tase me, bro!’ from all angles

Mike — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 17:09:23 GMT

Cameras? Why are they so afraid of the spoken word?!